EWTN.com - Servers Assisting at Mass: "Servers Assisting at Mass
Before Vatican II only males could serve at Mass. Now females are permitted to serve at Mass as well as males. Did the Code of Canon Law only allow males to serve, and now it has been changed? Or were females always allowed to serve at Mass?
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/28/2008:
When the 1983 Code of Canon Law was promulgated, it no longer restricted serving in those liturgical ministries to males. After the promulgation of the code, there was an official clarification from the Vatican making it clear that the law had changed.
Under the 1917 code, females were not permitted to serve."
EWTN.com - Holy Day Obligation
EWTN.com - Holy Day Obligation: "Holy Day Obligation
Hello Father: I belong to a Roman Rite parish and sometimes I attend a Byzantine Parish up the road on Saturday @ 6:00 Pm to fullfill my Sunday Obligation and I was wondering; Now with (ALL SAINT'S Day)-NOV 1st) around the corner can I also fullfill both my Holy Day Obligation as well by attending Mass There @ 6:00 Pm even though ALL SAINTS DAY isn't a HOLY DAY in the BYZANTINE Liturgical Calender GOD BLESS !!! John Fleming
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/28/2008:
If you are a member of the Latin Church, then you are not obligated to attend Mass on All Saints Day since the obligation to attend Mass has been abrogated this year because of the fact that the solemnity falls on a Saturday."
Hello Father: I belong to a Roman Rite parish and sometimes I attend a Byzantine Parish up the road on Saturday @ 6:00 Pm to fullfill my Sunday Obligation and I was wondering; Now with (ALL SAINT'S Day)-NOV 1st) around the corner can I also fullfill both my Holy Day Obligation as well by attending Mass There @ 6:00 Pm even though ALL SAINTS DAY isn't a HOLY DAY in the BYZANTINE Liturgical Calender GOD BLESS !!! John Fleming
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/28/2008:
If you are a member of the Latin Church, then you are not obligated to attend Mass on All Saints Day since the obligation to attend Mass has been abrogated this year because of the fact that the solemnity falls on a Saturday."
EWTN.com - Servers Assisting at Mass
EWTN.com - Servers Assisting at Mass: "Servers Assisting at Mass
Before Vatican II only males could serve at Mass. Now females are permitted to serve at Mass as well as males. Did the Code of Canon Law only allow males to serve, and now it has been changed? Or were females always allowed to serve at Mass?
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/28/2008:
When the 1983 Code of Canon Law was promulgated, it no longer restricted serving in those liturgical ministries to males. After the promulgation of the code, there was an official clarification from the Vatican making it clear that the law had changed.
Under the 1917 code, females were not permitted to serve."
Before Vatican II only males could serve at Mass. Now females are permitted to serve at Mass as well as males. Did the Code of Canon Law only allow males to serve, and now it has been changed? Or were females always allowed to serve at Mass?
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/28/2008:
When the 1983 Code of Canon Law was promulgated, it no longer restricted serving in those liturgical ministries to males. After the promulgation of the code, there was an official clarification from the Vatican making it clear that the law had changed.
Under the 1917 code, females were not permitted to serve."
EWTN.com - public excommunications
EWTN.com - public excommunications: "public excommunications
Hi Judy,
I think my head will blow off if I hear another 'pro-life catholic' politician or academic twist him/herself into a pretzel with ridiculous arguments purporting how Obama will reduce abortions. These people give public scandal to the Church. In addition, they set a poor example for other Catholics who may use them as justification for voting for Obama.
Public scandals call for public remedies. Why don't Bishops in this country publicly excommunicate these people so that they can no longer go around referring to themselves as 'Catholic'? For example, why not publicly threaten all Catholic politicians who vote for the forthcoming Freedom of Choice Act (assuming Obama gets in) with instant and public excommunication? I believe Bishops in other countries (notably in South America) have either taken or threatened to take similar actions.
Also, I am fed up with my tax money going to fund abortion. This will become exacerbated in the extreme with an Obama administration. I'd like the Church to be more vocal on this as well since Catholics are being forced to fund objectively evil activities which are outside the scope of prudential judgement.
God bless, Tom
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/24/2008:
Your comments reflect the anxiety and discomfort of many Catholics in America today. We do live in the middle of the most hedonistic, Godless nation in history, at least in my humble opinion.
So what to do? Well, to begin, we need to use every opportunity we can to raise awareness about what the act of abortion actually is and why the act should be defined in law as a crime. We need to start acting like Catholics who are not afraid to be stoned by the media, if that should come to pass.
My view of most of the Bishops is that they are fearful of public attitudes, negative media and so forth. They have lost their zeal to follow Christ and defend His truth regardless of how many people leave the Church, regardless of the bad press they might get, regardless of the decrease in collections. The point is ... abortion is murder and they should be publicly excoriating, denying the body of Christ and making it perfectly clear that these individuals are not in union with the Church ... period!
Let us pray for patience and that each feeling of anxiety or anger that we have will be channeled into something good for Christ who is, after all, the inspiration for all that is good since He is perfect Good, perfect Love and perfect Justice.
Judie Brown"
Hi Judy,
I think my head will blow off if I hear another 'pro-life catholic' politician or academic twist him/herself into a pretzel with ridiculous arguments purporting how Obama will reduce abortions. These people give public scandal to the Church. In addition, they set a poor example for other Catholics who may use them as justification for voting for Obama.
Public scandals call for public remedies. Why don't Bishops in this country publicly excommunicate these people so that they can no longer go around referring to themselves as 'Catholic'? For example, why not publicly threaten all Catholic politicians who vote for the forthcoming Freedom of Choice Act (assuming Obama gets in) with instant and public excommunication? I believe Bishops in other countries (notably in South America) have either taken or threatened to take similar actions.
Also, I am fed up with my tax money going to fund abortion. This will become exacerbated in the extreme with an Obama administration. I'd like the Church to be more vocal on this as well since Catholics are being forced to fund objectively evil activities which are outside the scope of prudential judgement.
God bless, Tom
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/24/2008:
Your comments reflect the anxiety and discomfort of many Catholics in America today. We do live in the middle of the most hedonistic, Godless nation in history, at least in my humble opinion.
So what to do? Well, to begin, we need to use every opportunity we can to raise awareness about what the act of abortion actually is and why the act should be defined in law as a crime. We need to start acting like Catholics who are not afraid to be stoned by the media, if that should come to pass.
My view of most of the Bishops is that they are fearful of public attitudes, negative media and so forth. They have lost their zeal to follow Christ and defend His truth regardless of how many people leave the Church, regardless of the bad press they might get, regardless of the decrease in collections. The point is ... abortion is murder and they should be publicly excoriating, denying the body of Christ and making it perfectly clear that these individuals are not in union with the Church ... period!
Let us pray for patience and that each feeling of anxiety or anger that we have will be channeled into something good for Christ who is, after all, the inspiration for all that is good since He is perfect Good, perfect Love and perfect Justice.
Judie Brown"
EWTN.com - Abortion in Ireland
EWTN.com - Abortion in Ireland: "Abortion in Ireland
Dear Judie, I wrote to you previously from Ireland about the 'Cura Four.' We had a great victory this week when the British Parliament had no time to discuss the amendments to the bill going through at the moment. Some British M.Ps wanted abortion to be introduced in Northern Ireland. Last Saturday we went to Stormont, the seat of politics in northern Ireland to protest and say we refused to have abortion in Northern Ireland. We stood in torrential rain and cold for over 3 hours but we were highly edified by knowing that the four main political parties in Northern Ireland were solidly on the pro-life side. On Wednesday we heard that there will be no abortion in Northern Ireland, at least during the present government's time. There have been protests of course from the F.P.A. ( Family Planning Organisation) stating that women have lost out but we are ecstatic at the moment. You'd be pleased to know that buses from all over the Republic of Ireland were also at Stormont. There were 3000 people there altogether. I thought you could use some good news. Praise God. Kathleen Tierney-Pilkiewicz Ireland.
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/24/2008:
Praise God and thank you for sharing this amazing news! What a great grace it must have been to be a public witness for the babies!
Judie Brown"
Dear Judie, I wrote to you previously from Ireland about the 'Cura Four.' We had a great victory this week when the British Parliament had no time to discuss the amendments to the bill going through at the moment. Some British M.Ps wanted abortion to be introduced in Northern Ireland. Last Saturday we went to Stormont, the seat of politics in northern Ireland to protest and say we refused to have abortion in Northern Ireland. We stood in torrential rain and cold for over 3 hours but we were highly edified by knowing that the four main political parties in Northern Ireland were solidly on the pro-life side. On Wednesday we heard that there will be no abortion in Northern Ireland, at least during the present government's time. There have been protests of course from the F.P.A. ( Family Planning Organisation) stating that women have lost out but we are ecstatic at the moment. You'd be pleased to know that buses from all over the Republic of Ireland were also at Stormont. There were 3000 people there altogether. I thought you could use some good news. Praise God. Kathleen Tierney-Pilkiewicz Ireland.
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/24/2008:
Praise God and thank you for sharing this amazing news! What a great grace it must have been to be a public witness for the babies!
Judie Brown"
EWTN.com - receiving communion
EWTN.com - receiving communion: "receiving communion
Can a Catholic receive Communion at a Lutheran Church? If not, what is the explanation?
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/17/2008:
No. Lutherans do not have the same beliefs and understanding as Catholics do with regards to the Eucharist. In addition, we believe that only a validly ordained Priest may say Mass and confect the Eucharist. For a Catholic to receive the Lutheran 'communion' would be to say that there's a unity between the Church and the Lutherans that does not yet exist."
Can a Catholic receive Communion at a Lutheran Church? If not, what is the explanation?
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/17/2008:
No. Lutherans do not have the same beliefs and understanding as Catholics do with regards to the Eucharist. In addition, we believe that only a validly ordained Priest may say Mass and confect the Eucharist. For a Catholic to receive the Lutheran 'communion' would be to say that there's a unity between the Church and the Lutherans that does not yet exist."
EWTN.com - Baptismal sponsorship
EWTN.com - Baptismal sponsorship: "Baptismal sponsorship
Is there a rule that you can sponsor a child with in a family only one time?
My husband and I are my niece’s first born sponsor of baptism. She recently had her second child and we have heard through the grape-vine of my family that she and her husband want to ask us to be their second child’s sponsor for baptism as well.
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/28/2008:
There is no limit as to how many times a person may act as a Sponsor. The only restriction Canon Law offers is that a parent cannot serve as sponsor of their child."
Is there a rule that you can sponsor a child with in a family only one time?
My husband and I are my niece’s first born sponsor of baptism. She recently had her second child and we have heard through the grape-vine of my family that she and her husband want to ask us to be their second child’s sponsor for baptism as well.
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/28/2008:
There is no limit as to how many times a person may act as a Sponsor. The only restriction Canon Law offers is that a parent cannot serve as sponsor of their child."
EWTN.com - Prayers for souls in purgatory
EWTN.com - Prayers for souls in purgatory: "Prayers for souls in purgatory
I recently asked a priest how long we should pray for a specific soul that has passed and may be in purgatory and his answer was 'until you meet that person in heaven'. That sounded good but what happens to the prayers and sacrifices that we offer for a soul if that soul has indeed already gone to hell. Since we cannot 'ransom' that person from hell what affect has our prayer had and has all that was offered up for that lost soul all for naught? Thank you.
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/27/2008:
If a person is in Purgatory, they are not going to hell. Those who are judged by Christ to deserve hell go there right after judgment. Purgatory is a time of purification for those who will eventually get to heaven. Prayers for souls in purgatory can help them get to heaven sooner. A soul in Hell cannot be 'released' to Heaven."
I recently asked a priest how long we should pray for a specific soul that has passed and may be in purgatory and his answer was 'until you meet that person in heaven'. That sounded good but what happens to the prayers and sacrifices that we offer for a soul if that soul has indeed already gone to hell. Since we cannot 'ransom' that person from hell what affect has our prayer had and has all that was offered up for that lost soul all for naught? Thank you.
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/27/2008:
If a person is in Purgatory, they are not going to hell. Those who are judged by Christ to deserve hell go there right after judgment. Purgatory is a time of purification for those who will eventually get to heaven. Prayers for souls in purgatory can help them get to heaven sooner. A soul in Hell cannot be 'released' to Heaven."
EWTN.com - sacrament of penance
EWTN.com - sacrament of penance: "sacrament of penance
Dear Fr. Trigilio & Fr. Levis Congratulations on your show, I really love watching it here in the Philippines. My question is: Will it be possible that the Sacrament of Confession be given on-line or in the internet since the Sacrament of Eucharist can be viewed from the television, as like the Mass in the Vatican previewed to the whole world and the final blessing of the Pope is valid to everyone watching it as his blessing with the people in St. Peter's Square?
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/26/2008:
A blessing (even from the Pope) is a Sacramental, not a Sacrament. Sacraments must be done in person."
Dear Fr. Trigilio & Fr. Levis Congratulations on your show, I really love watching it here in the Philippines. My question is: Will it be possible that the Sacrament of Confession be given on-line or in the internet since the Sacrament of Eucharist can be viewed from the television, as like the Mass in the Vatican previewed to the whole world and the final blessing of the Pope is valid to everyone watching it as his blessing with the people in St. Peter's Square?
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/26/2008:
A blessing (even from the Pope) is a Sacramental, not a Sacrament. Sacraments must be done in person."
EWTN.com - deformed fetus
EWTN.com - deformed fetus: "deformed fetus
My daughter in law posted this on her blog. I am the one who told her we cannot blame God if the fetus is born deformed. She will not accept the fact that it will be born any way but perfect. Please read and help me answer her. Thank you. Here is her blog: I can't believe it's the final trimester. We had another ultrasound Wednesday. The technician really didn't show us very much. She couldn't isolate the arms for us to take a good look at. Basically she measured fluid, head and abdomen and everything looked good.
I told my Father-In-Law, in less than 3 months we'll see if all the prayers and well wishes paid off. I said, I'm worried that if our daughter actually does have some kind of challenge, I will be really mad at God for not responding the way we're asking. He said 'you can't blame God' Really? Why can't I?
When she comes out perfect like I expect her too, God will get the credit. Why shouldn't he get the blame if my prayers are not answered?
I'm sure there are all kinds of theological responses to this question.
But in the bible it says 'Ask and you shall receive' So I'm asking and I'm expecting to receive, a baby that's healthy and whole. Isn't it that easy?
I am noticing my stomach growing by leaps and bounds. It seems like it gets bigger every week. The third trimester makes me realize how little I've done to get ready for this baby. Joe and I have been so focused on our challenge of positive thinking.
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/27/2008:
To blame God for something that does not have the outcome one desires is quite natural, and it occurs to me that your daughter in law is using a type of logic that is designed basicallly to prepare her for something she does not care to accept. My advice at this point is to say only that every child is a gift from God, and that only in time will she appreciate His miraculous work, given to her with His love and grace.
Once she sees the baby, my guess is all those negative thought about an imperfect baby will cease to be a problem. I will pray for her.
Judie Brown"
My daughter in law posted this on her blog. I am the one who told her we cannot blame God if the fetus is born deformed. She will not accept the fact that it will be born any way but perfect. Please read and help me answer her. Thank you. Here is her blog: I can't believe it's the final trimester. We had another ultrasound Wednesday. The technician really didn't show us very much. She couldn't isolate the arms for us to take a good look at. Basically she measured fluid, head and abdomen and everything looked good.
I told my Father-In-Law, in less than 3 months we'll see if all the prayers and well wishes paid off. I said, I'm worried that if our daughter actually does have some kind of challenge, I will be really mad at God for not responding the way we're asking. He said 'you can't blame God' Really? Why can't I?
When she comes out perfect like I expect her too, God will get the credit. Why shouldn't he get the blame if my prayers are not answered?
I'm sure there are all kinds of theological responses to this question.
But in the bible it says 'Ask and you shall receive' So I'm asking and I'm expecting to receive, a baby that's healthy and whole. Isn't it that easy?
I am noticing my stomach growing by leaps and bounds. It seems like it gets bigger every week. The third trimester makes me realize how little I've done to get ready for this baby. Joe and I have been so focused on our challenge of positive thinking.
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/27/2008:
To blame God for something that does not have the outcome one desires is quite natural, and it occurs to me that your daughter in law is using a type of logic that is designed basicallly to prepare her for something she does not care to accept. My advice at this point is to say only that every child is a gift from God, and that only in time will she appreciate His miraculous work, given to her with His love and grace.
Once she sees the baby, my guess is all those negative thought about an imperfect baby will cease to be a problem. I will pray for her.
Judie Brown"
Catholic Culture : Library : Baltimore Archbishop Enjoins Silence on Alleged Visionary
Catholic Culture : Library : Baltimore Archbishop Enjoins Silence on Alleged Visionary: "Baltimore Archbishop Enjoins Silence on Alleged Visionary
by Archbishop Edwin F. O'Brien
Pastoral Advisory
To the Christian faithful of the Archdiocese of Baltimore:
Over the course of several years, information has been made available which suggests that messages and locutions have been given to Gianna Talone-Sullivan by the Virgin Mother of the Lord. These alleged messages and locutions are supposedly to be shared with members of the Christian faithful. Recent messages and activity by those who support Mrs. Talone-Sullivan have created confusion among many and division in our parishes and our Archdiocese.
On more than one occasion, the Archdiocese of Baltimore has conducted investigations into these matters in an effort to protect the faith and good morals of the Christian faithful. Each investigation has concluded that there is nothing of significance to be found in the messages and locutions. Most recently, the results of the investigation were submitted for the consideration of the Holy See's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. After thorough study and careful consideration, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith concluded that the Archbishop of Baltimore was in a position to issue a decree concluding the investigation and declaring that there was nothing supernatural about any of the messages or locutions. The decree further stated that no public activity relating to the alleged apparitions and locutions is to take place on properties of the Archdiocese of Baltimore.
Although my predecessor, Cardinal William H. Keeler, and others in the Archdiocese spoke out clearly, it is now apparent to me that more must be done to protect the faith and good morals of the Christian faithful from possible distortion and harm. In virtue of my office as chief shepherd of the people of the Archdiocese of Baltimore and directed particularly by Canon 823 §1, I seek to protect the faith and good morals of the Christian faithful entrusted to my care so that no harm be done to them. To that end, I have consulted with those entrusted with the pastoral care of all affected by these messages and locutions, and I have listened carefully to those members of the Christian faithful who wished to be heard on the matter and those whose rights could be injured.
The Directory on Popular Piety and the Liturgy issued by Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments offers principles and guidelines for pious practices of the Christian people. Of particular pertinence to this matter is its paragraph 90:
Popular Piety and Private Revelation
90. Popular piety has always been interested in extraordinary happenings and events that are not infrequently connected with private revelations. While not confined to Marian piety alone, this phenomenon is particularly involved with 'apparitions' and 'messages'. In this regard, it is useful to recall what the Catechism of the Catholic Church says about private revelation: 'Throughout the ages, there have been so-called private revelations, some of which have been recognised by the authority of the Church. They do not belong, however, to the deposit of faith. It is not their role to improve or complete Christ's definitive Revelation, but to help live more fully by it in a certain period of history. Guided by the Magisterium of the Church, the sensus fidelium knows how to discern and welcome in these revelations whatever constitutes an authentic call of Christ or his saints to the Church' (n. 67).
The alleged apparitions to Gianna Sullivan have not been recognized by the authority of the Church. Studied in detail by experts in theology and other pertinent fields, the investigations have come to the conclusion that the alleged apparitions are not supernatural in origin. This has been confirmed by the authority of the Church.
Therefore, I strongly caution all the faithful regarding these purported apparitions to be guided by the Magisterium which cannot affirm them as authentic. The confusion and division that have come as a result of these apparitions have prompted me to take this public and decisive step.
I also strongly caution Mrs. Gianna Talone-Sullivan not to communicate in any manner whatsoever, written or spoken, electronic or printed, personally or through another in any church, public oratory, chapel or any other place or locale, public or private, within the jurisdiction of the Archdiocese of Baltimore any information of any type related to or containing messages or locutions allegedly received froth the Virgin Mother of God.
Further, I strongly caution those who participate in any activity surrounding these alleged apparitions or who seek to disseminate information and promote them here in the Archdiocese. To do so is a great disservice to the Church and creates further confusion and division among the faithful.
It is my hope that this warning will result in greater clarity for the faithful and resolve the divisions created by this situation. May Mary, Mother of the Church, intercede for us, now and always.
Given at Baltimore, Maryland on October 8, 2008.
Signed:
+ Edwin F. O'Brien
Archbishop of Baltimore
Witnessed:
(Rev. Msgr.) Robert J. Jaskot
Chancellor
© Archdiocese of Baltimore"
by Archbishop Edwin F. O'Brien
Pastoral Advisory
To the Christian faithful of the Archdiocese of Baltimore:
Over the course of several years, information has been made available which suggests that messages and locutions have been given to Gianna Talone-Sullivan by the Virgin Mother of the Lord. These alleged messages and locutions are supposedly to be shared with members of the Christian faithful. Recent messages and activity by those who support Mrs. Talone-Sullivan have created confusion among many and division in our parishes and our Archdiocese.
On more than one occasion, the Archdiocese of Baltimore has conducted investigations into these matters in an effort to protect the faith and good morals of the Christian faithful. Each investigation has concluded that there is nothing of significance to be found in the messages and locutions. Most recently, the results of the investigation were submitted for the consideration of the Holy See's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. After thorough study and careful consideration, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith concluded that the Archbishop of Baltimore was in a position to issue a decree concluding the investigation and declaring that there was nothing supernatural about any of the messages or locutions. The decree further stated that no public activity relating to the alleged apparitions and locutions is to take place on properties of the Archdiocese of Baltimore.
Although my predecessor, Cardinal William H. Keeler, and others in the Archdiocese spoke out clearly, it is now apparent to me that more must be done to protect the faith and good morals of the Christian faithful from possible distortion and harm. In virtue of my office as chief shepherd of the people of the Archdiocese of Baltimore and directed particularly by Canon 823 §1, I seek to protect the faith and good morals of the Christian faithful entrusted to my care so that no harm be done to them. To that end, I have consulted with those entrusted with the pastoral care of all affected by these messages and locutions, and I have listened carefully to those members of the Christian faithful who wished to be heard on the matter and those whose rights could be injured.
The Directory on Popular Piety and the Liturgy issued by Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments offers principles and guidelines for pious practices of the Christian people. Of particular pertinence to this matter is its paragraph 90:
Popular Piety and Private Revelation
90. Popular piety has always been interested in extraordinary happenings and events that are not infrequently connected with private revelations. While not confined to Marian piety alone, this phenomenon is particularly involved with 'apparitions' and 'messages'. In this regard, it is useful to recall what the Catechism of the Catholic Church says about private revelation: 'Throughout the ages, there have been so-called private revelations, some of which have been recognised by the authority of the Church. They do not belong, however, to the deposit of faith. It is not their role to improve or complete Christ's definitive Revelation, but to help live more fully by it in a certain period of history. Guided by the Magisterium of the Church, the sensus fidelium knows how to discern and welcome in these revelations whatever constitutes an authentic call of Christ or his saints to the Church' (n. 67).
The alleged apparitions to Gianna Sullivan have not been recognized by the authority of the Church. Studied in detail by experts in theology and other pertinent fields, the investigations have come to the conclusion that the alleged apparitions are not supernatural in origin. This has been confirmed by the authority of the Church.
Therefore, I strongly caution all the faithful regarding these purported apparitions to be guided by the Magisterium which cannot affirm them as authentic. The confusion and division that have come as a result of these apparitions have prompted me to take this public and decisive step.
I also strongly caution Mrs. Gianna Talone-Sullivan not to communicate in any manner whatsoever, written or spoken, electronic or printed, personally or through another in any church, public oratory, chapel or any other place or locale, public or private, within the jurisdiction of the Archdiocese of Baltimore any information of any type related to or containing messages or locutions allegedly received froth the Virgin Mother of God.
Further, I strongly caution those who participate in any activity surrounding these alleged apparitions or who seek to disseminate information and promote them here in the Archdiocese. To do so is a great disservice to the Church and creates further confusion and division among the faithful.
It is my hope that this warning will result in greater clarity for the faithful and resolve the divisions created by this situation. May Mary, Mother of the Church, intercede for us, now and always.
Given at Baltimore, Maryland on October 8, 2008.
Signed:
+ Edwin F. O'Brien
Archbishop of Baltimore
Witnessed:
(Rev. Msgr.) Robert J. Jaskot
Chancellor
© Archdiocese of Baltimore"
EWTN.com - Liturgy of The Hours
EWTN.com - Liturgy of The Hours: "Liturgy of The Hours
Why is it that Vatican II instructed that the Divine Office should become a greater part of the lives of average Catholics, yet it is rarely said in most Western-rite parishes?
Also, I don't understand why the Western Church chose to break with the immemorial tradition of saying all 150 Psalms each week and instead adopted the Anglican tradition of saying them in a month.
I'm a Byzantine Catholic, so my Horologion (our Liturgy of the Hours) still maintains that tradition.
I don't quite understand why your Divine Office is so foreign to the average Western-rite layperson, noting what Vatican II decree.
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/22/2008:
Sadly, you are correct. The documents clearly point to a greater and more widespread use of the Liturgy of the Hours in the Church. Why was it not done? Here it's hard to lay blame. Some priests tried to begin it in their parishes, but there was little or no turnout from the people. In other places, the priests simply never tried. I will say this: There are probably more parishes now who recite some part of the Liturgy of the Hours (most especially morning prayer before daily Mass) than ever before."
Why is it that Vatican II instructed that the Divine Office should become a greater part of the lives of average Catholics, yet it is rarely said in most Western-rite parishes?
Also, I don't understand why the Western Church chose to break with the immemorial tradition of saying all 150 Psalms each week and instead adopted the Anglican tradition of saying them in a month.
I'm a Byzantine Catholic, so my Horologion (our Liturgy of the Hours) still maintains that tradition.
I don't quite understand why your Divine Office is so foreign to the average Western-rite layperson, noting what Vatican II decree.
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/22/2008:
Sadly, you are correct. The documents clearly point to a greater and more widespread use of the Liturgy of the Hours in the Church. Why was it not done? Here it's hard to lay blame. Some priests tried to begin it in their parishes, but there was little or no turnout from the people. In other places, the priests simply never tried. I will say this: There are probably more parishes now who recite some part of the Liturgy of the Hours (most especially morning prayer before daily Mass) than ever before."
EWTN.com - receiving communion
EWTN.com - receiving communion: "receiving communion
Can a Catholic receive Communion at a Lutheran Church? If not, what is the explanation?
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/17/2008:
No. Lutherans do not have the same beliefs and understanding as Catholics do with regards to the Eucharist. In addition, we believe that only a validly ordained Priest may say Mass and confect the Eucharist. For a Catholic to receive the Lutheran 'communion' would be to say that there's a unity between the Church and the Lutherans that does not yet exist."
Can a Catholic receive Communion at a Lutheran Church? If not, what is the explanation?
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/17/2008:
No. Lutherans do not have the same beliefs and understanding as Catholics do with regards to the Eucharist. In addition, we believe that only a validly ordained Priest may say Mass and confect the Eucharist. For a Catholic to receive the Lutheran 'communion' would be to say that there's a unity between the Church and the Lutherans that does not yet exist."
EWTN.com - Healing Prayers
EWTN.com - Healing Prayers: "Healing Prayers
I would like to have prayers on healing. Prayers for friends and family dealing with Cancer.
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/17/2008:
I know of no specific prayers, but that doesn't mean that there's none out there. Many parishes have 'St. Peregrine Masses', in honor of the Patron Saint of cancer patients. You may do some research on St. Peregrine and perhaps you'll get some prayers."
I would like to have prayers on healing. Prayers for friends and family dealing with Cancer.
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/17/2008:
I know of no specific prayers, but that doesn't mean that there's none out there. Many parishes have 'St. Peregrine Masses', in honor of the Patron Saint of cancer patients. You may do some research on St. Peregrine and perhaps you'll get some prayers."
EWTN.com - What can laity do?
EWTN.com - What can laity do?: "What can laity do?
Please tell me what I can/should do about some people in my parish who not only leave mass right after receiving Communion, but they also heckle the priest during his homiies as though they are deliberately trying to provoke him. I can't find any 'official' teaching that specifically prohibits this deplorable behavior, so what are some steps I could take to stop this abuse?
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/17/2008:
I don't think there is much you can do to stop the rude behavior of some people; asking them to stop may even encourage them to do so even more. What I'd suggest is that you give as much support to your parish priest as you can, sending notes of encouragement, complimenting his homily after Mass, etc.
There may not be any 'official' teaching prohibiting such behavior, but common sense and decency should take precedence. Just because there's no specific rule against my hopping on one leg during Mass doesn't mean I should do it."
Please tell me what I can/should do about some people in my parish who not only leave mass right after receiving Communion, but they also heckle the priest during his homiies as though they are deliberately trying to provoke him. I can't find any 'official' teaching that specifically prohibits this deplorable behavior, so what are some steps I could take to stop this abuse?
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/17/2008:
I don't think there is much you can do to stop the rude behavior of some people; asking them to stop may even encourage them to do so even more. What I'd suggest is that you give as much support to your parish priest as you can, sending notes of encouragement, complimenting his homily after Mass, etc.
There may not be any 'official' teaching prohibiting such behavior, but common sense and decency should take precedence. Just because there's no specific rule against my hopping on one leg during Mass doesn't mean I should do it."
EWTN.com - new abortion bill in our Congress
EWTN.com - new abortion bill in our Congress: "new abortion bill in our Congress
I read in the Post about a new bill before both chambers of our Congress regarding abortion that I just could not believe. Can you tell me more about it and how it got introduced, by whom, etc? I think the Congress will have to return after Nov.4 elections to do anything or wait until the next president is installed. We here in our Bible Study on St. Paul would like to know more. Thank you. Ms. Alice J. Fink ajfink@peoplepc.com
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/22/2008:
I believe you may be hearing about the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) which is the bill that Congress will examine after inauguration, January of 2009. This bill is one of the most dangerous pro-abortion bills ever to be discussed. The pro-aborts attempted to pass it once before during Bill Clinton's presidency, and they failed.
We hope they fail again in 2009. To learn more about this bill and the ramifications it would have on the law, I recommend the fact sheet published by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, which is on line at
http://www.usccb.org/prolife/issues/FOCA/index.shtml
Judie Brown"
I read in the Post about a new bill before both chambers of our Congress regarding abortion that I just could not believe. Can you tell me more about it and how it got introduced, by whom, etc? I think the Congress will have to return after Nov.4 elections to do anything or wait until the next president is installed. We here in our Bible Study on St. Paul would like to know more. Thank you. Ms. Alice J. Fink ajfink@peoplepc.com
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/22/2008:
I believe you may be hearing about the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) which is the bill that Congress will examine after inauguration, January of 2009. This bill is one of the most dangerous pro-abortion bills ever to be discussed. The pro-aborts attempted to pass it once before during Bill Clinton's presidency, and they failed.
We hope they fail again in 2009. To learn more about this bill and the ramifications it would have on the law, I recommend the fact sheet published by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, which is on line at
http://www.usccb.org/prolife/issues/FOCA/index.shtml
Judie Brown"
EWTN.com - picture of an unborn child
EWTN.com - picture of an unborn child: "picture of an unborn child
Dear Judie Brown, Hello. I think there are many appropriate times to display a full-color picture of a 10-week-old unborn baby and explain that killing such a baby is never a 'choice' and never 'reproductive freedom.' Some examples of when this may be done include: 1)during debates; 2)at public dinners such as the recent Al Smith dinner which, from my understanding, had in attendance the Democratic nominee and Republican nominee for the presidency; 3)during interviews on network television outlets; and, 4)at political rallies. People with various beliefs about killing unborn babies would get to see the same picture. And, they would hear the same pro-life talk which could include the fact that killing an unborn baby is a crime against humanity. What do you think it will take to get this to happen? Sincerely, Patrick Benedict
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/22/2008:
Dear Patrick
I have not heard from you in a long time, and extend my hopes that you are well and hard at work. Obviously you are.
American Life League is working on a set of graphic posters as I write this; presenting fetal development and the horror of abortion. The purpose of this project is for education on campuses, with media and so forth.
Keep your eye on our website, where the details will be available once the project is produced. We are hoping for January 22, 2009
Thanks for asking and God be with you.
Judie Brown"
Dear Judie Brown, Hello. I think there are many appropriate times to display a full-color picture of a 10-week-old unborn baby and explain that killing such a baby is never a 'choice' and never 'reproductive freedom.' Some examples of when this may be done include: 1)during debates; 2)at public dinners such as the recent Al Smith dinner which, from my understanding, had in attendance the Democratic nominee and Republican nominee for the presidency; 3)during interviews on network television outlets; and, 4)at political rallies. People with various beliefs about killing unborn babies would get to see the same picture. And, they would hear the same pro-life talk which could include the fact that killing an unborn baby is a crime against humanity. What do you think it will take to get this to happen? Sincerely, Patrick Benedict
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/22/2008:
Dear Patrick
I have not heard from you in a long time, and extend my hopes that you are well and hard at work. Obviously you are.
American Life League is working on a set of graphic posters as I write this; presenting fetal development and the horror of abortion. The purpose of this project is for education on campuses, with media and so forth.
Keep your eye on our website, where the details will be available once the project is produced. We are hoping for January 22, 2009
Thanks for asking and God be with you.
Judie Brown"
EWTN.com - Catholic Charities
EWTN.com - Catholic Charities: "Catholic Charities
Is it all right to contribute to Catholic Charites? I read that at one time they were giving out condoms in the third world countries & were in involved in the abortion of a teenage girl on the east coast.
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/16/2008:
Dear Beverly
Let me set the record straight for you.
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES is promoting 'complete information' on condoms for those who have AIDS or could be susceptible to acquiring the HIV virus. The facts on this are at http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?id=8093&CFID=84922716&CFTOKEN=65094630
Catholic Charities in the Richmond, Virginia diocese facilitated getting an abortion for an immigrant, and the staff involved in that were allegedly fired. But a cloud remains over this entire matter in my opinion. You can read about it at http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/jun/08061906.html
In general Catholic Charities does not fit into a totally 'good' or all 'bad' category; it depends on where you live and what the agency is involved with where you live.
Judie Brown"
Is it all right to contribute to Catholic Charites? I read that at one time they were giving out condoms in the third world countries & were in involved in the abortion of a teenage girl on the east coast.
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/16/2008:
Dear Beverly
Let me set the record straight for you.
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES is promoting 'complete information' on condoms for those who have AIDS or could be susceptible to acquiring the HIV virus. The facts on this are at http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?id=8093&CFID=84922716&CFTOKEN=65094630
Catholic Charities in the Richmond, Virginia diocese facilitated getting an abortion for an immigrant, and the staff involved in that were allegedly fired. But a cloud remains over this entire matter in my opinion. You can read about it at http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/jun/08061906.html
In general Catholic Charities does not fit into a totally 'good' or all 'bad' category; it depends on where you live and what the agency is involved with where you live.
Judie Brown"
EWTN.com - is this group pro-Life?
EWTN.com - is this group pro-Life?: "is this group pro-Life?
What can you tell me about a group called 'Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good'?
The director is Alexia Kelley.
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/16/2008:
Dear AER
The organization Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good are what we (I) call cafeteria Catholics, or more precisely, Seamless Garment Catholics.
As it says on their web site in one press statement:
“Too often our abortion debate has been used to score political points by both sides, rather than to identify what kinds of public policies will actually prevent and reduce abortions in America. This data shows that policy makers on both sides of the aisle have a moral imperative to enact legislation that provides economic and social supports for vulnerable women and families in order to reduce abortions,” said Alexia Kelley, Executive Director of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good. “Being pro-life is not just a slogan. It requires concrete programs and public policies that help women and families with robust economic and social supports. Both political parties can agree to unite behind comprehensive strategies that reduce abortions.”
In other words, there is no effort coming from this group to actually define abortion as murder and to strive to end it; there is an effort to work for the 'common good' on 'Common ground.' That sends off warning bells in my head.
I am sure they do some good work, but their focus is not on exposing evil.
Judie Brown"
What can you tell me about a group called 'Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good'?
The director is Alexia Kelley.
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/16/2008:
Dear AER
The organization Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good are what we (I) call cafeteria Catholics, or more precisely, Seamless Garment Catholics.
As it says on their web site in one press statement:
“Too often our abortion debate has been used to score political points by both sides, rather than to identify what kinds of public policies will actually prevent and reduce abortions in America. This data shows that policy makers on both sides of the aisle have a moral imperative to enact legislation that provides economic and social supports for vulnerable women and families in order to reduce abortions,” said Alexia Kelley, Executive Director of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good. “Being pro-life is not just a slogan. It requires concrete programs and public policies that help women and families with robust economic and social supports. Both political parties can agree to unite behind comprehensive strategies that reduce abortions.”
In other words, there is no effort coming from this group to actually define abortion as murder and to strive to end it; there is an effort to work for the 'common good' on 'Common ground.' That sends off warning bells in my head.
I am sure they do some good work, but their focus is not on exposing evil.
Judie Brown"
Pope praises new film for showing JPII’s ‘valor’ and ‘evangelical passion’
Pope praises new film for showing JPII’s ‘valor’ and ‘evangelical passion’: "Pope praises new film for showing JPII’s ‘valor’ and ‘evangelical passion’
Vatican City, Oct 17, 2008 / 10:09 am (CNA).- The Vatican’s Paul VI Hall hosted a screening of a new documentary on the life of Pope John Paul II on Thursday afternoon. Following the film, Pope Benedict XVI praised the affectionate tribute for its ability to convey the “valor and evangelical passion” of the late Pope.
The new film, which is called “Testimony” is based on the book 'A Life with Karol' by Cardinal Stanislaw Dziwisz, who was John Paul II´s personal assistant, and the Italian journalist Gian Franco Svidercoschi.
With the final scenes of “Testimony” echoing in the minds of the audience, Pope Benedict offered his reflections on the documentary.
The film 'takes our minds back to that late evening of October 16, 1978, thirty years ago today, which has remained engraved in everyone's heart' Benedict XVI said recalling the late Pope´s first words to the crowd waiting to greet their new shepherd, 'If I make a mistake [in the language] you will correct me.'
Encapsulating the life of the Pontiff, Pope Benedict said, 'We could say that the pontificate of John Paul II is enclosed between two expressions: ‘Open the doors to Christ! Do not be afraid,’ and his words on his deathbed: ‘Let me go to the house of the Father’.”
“Testimony,” the Holy Father noted, reveals “previously unknown episodes,” and displays “the human simplicity, the firm courage and, finally, the suffering of John Paul II, which he faced to the end with his inborn hardiness and the patience of a humble servant of the Gospel.'
'The film also gives us a better understanding of John Paul II's homeland, Poland, and of its cultural and religious traditions,' said the Pope. 'It enables us to revisit famous events in ecclesial and civil life, and episodes of which most people are unaware. The whole story is recounted with the affection of one who shared closely in these events, living in the shadow of their protagonist.'
Pope John Paul II left a mark on the history of the Church and the world, Pope Benedict noted, and 'thanks to this film' those who did not know him 'have a way of appreciating his valor and evangelical passion.'
After thanking Cardinal Dziwisz, who remained at Karol Wojtyla's side for 39 years, and the director of the film and his associates, Benedict XVI reiterated John Paul II's invitation, 'do not be afraid,' and told those present, many of whom were Poles, to 'bear witness to Christ courageously.'
'Testimony' was directed by the Polish director Pawel Pitera and filmed in the Vatican, Krakow, Wadowice (Karol Wojtyla’s birthplace), Rome, Portugal and Germany. It is narrated by Cardinal Dziwisz himself and by the English actor, Michael York."
Vatican City, Oct 17, 2008 / 10:09 am (CNA).- The Vatican’s Paul VI Hall hosted a screening of a new documentary on the life of Pope John Paul II on Thursday afternoon. Following the film, Pope Benedict XVI praised the affectionate tribute for its ability to convey the “valor and evangelical passion” of the late Pope.
The new film, which is called “Testimony” is based on the book 'A Life with Karol' by Cardinal Stanislaw Dziwisz, who was John Paul II´s personal assistant, and the Italian journalist Gian Franco Svidercoschi.
With the final scenes of “Testimony” echoing in the minds of the audience, Pope Benedict offered his reflections on the documentary.
The film 'takes our minds back to that late evening of October 16, 1978, thirty years ago today, which has remained engraved in everyone's heart' Benedict XVI said recalling the late Pope´s first words to the crowd waiting to greet their new shepherd, 'If I make a mistake [in the language] you will correct me.'
Encapsulating the life of the Pontiff, Pope Benedict said, 'We could say that the pontificate of John Paul II is enclosed between two expressions: ‘Open the doors to Christ! Do not be afraid,’ and his words on his deathbed: ‘Let me go to the house of the Father’.”
“Testimony,” the Holy Father noted, reveals “previously unknown episodes,” and displays “the human simplicity, the firm courage and, finally, the suffering of John Paul II, which he faced to the end with his inborn hardiness and the patience of a humble servant of the Gospel.'
'The film also gives us a better understanding of John Paul II's homeland, Poland, and of its cultural and religious traditions,' said the Pope. 'It enables us to revisit famous events in ecclesial and civil life, and episodes of which most people are unaware. The whole story is recounted with the affection of one who shared closely in these events, living in the shadow of their protagonist.'
Pope John Paul II left a mark on the history of the Church and the world, Pope Benedict noted, and 'thanks to this film' those who did not know him 'have a way of appreciating his valor and evangelical passion.'
After thanking Cardinal Dziwisz, who remained at Karol Wojtyla's side for 39 years, and the director of the film and his associates, Benedict XVI reiterated John Paul II's invitation, 'do not be afraid,' and told those present, many of whom were Poles, to 'bear witness to Christ courageously.'
'Testimony' was directed by the Polish director Pawel Pitera and filmed in the Vatican, Krakow, Wadowice (Karol Wojtyla’s birthplace), Rome, Portugal and Germany. It is narrated by Cardinal Dziwisz himself and by the English actor, Michael York."
Election of John Paul II marked historic milestone, says director of the L’Osservatore Romano
Election of John Paul II marked historic milestone, says director of the L’Osservatore Romano: "Election of John Paul II marked historic milestone, says director of the L’Osservatore Romano
Vatican City, Oct 17, 2008 / 07:46 pm (CNA).- The director of the L’Osservatore Romano, Giovanni Maria Vian, published an editorial this week dedicated to the 30th anniversary of the election of Pope John Paul II, recalling that his election marked an historic milestone since he was the first Slavic successor of St. Peter.
In his editorial, Vian wrote that “on the afternoon of October 16, 1978, thirty years ago, the election of Cardinal Karol Wojtyla marked a true turn in the history of the succession of the Roman chair. After almost half a millennium, since the time of Adrian VI (1522—1523), the College of Cardinals chose as Bishop of Rome a cardinal who was not of Italian origin. And for the first time in history, a Slav became Pontiff.”
After his elevation to the cardinalate by Paul VI, “the young Polish archbishop became an important protagonist in the Catholic Church, although many did not know him,” Vian wrote. By assuming a double name, the new Pope “undoubtedly confirmed continuity with John XXIII and Paul VI and gave a voice to the so-called silent Church muzzled by the Communist regimes.”
“In the world’s memory is the image of that Pope who thirty years ago introduced himself as having come from a faraway land and who soon gave visibility to the Catholic Church.” He was able to accomplish this “thanks above all to the numerous international trips that made him a familiar figure across the planet, and to his powerful teaching rooted in the love of Christ and the defense of the human being: a teaching heard by many non-believers and that will not be without fruit,” Vian wrote."
Vatican City, Oct 17, 2008 / 07:46 pm (CNA).- The director of the L’Osservatore Romano, Giovanni Maria Vian, published an editorial this week dedicated to the 30th anniversary of the election of Pope John Paul II, recalling that his election marked an historic milestone since he was the first Slavic successor of St. Peter.
In his editorial, Vian wrote that “on the afternoon of October 16, 1978, thirty years ago, the election of Cardinal Karol Wojtyla marked a true turn in the history of the succession of the Roman chair. After almost half a millennium, since the time of Adrian VI (1522—1523), the College of Cardinals chose as Bishop of Rome a cardinal who was not of Italian origin. And for the first time in history, a Slav became Pontiff.”
After his elevation to the cardinalate by Paul VI, “the young Polish archbishop became an important protagonist in the Catholic Church, although many did not know him,” Vian wrote. By assuming a double name, the new Pope “undoubtedly confirmed continuity with John XXIII and Paul VI and gave a voice to the so-called silent Church muzzled by the Communist regimes.”
“In the world’s memory is the image of that Pope who thirty years ago introduced himself as having come from a faraway land and who soon gave visibility to the Catholic Church.” He was able to accomplish this “thanks above all to the numerous international trips that made him a familiar figure across the planet, and to his powerful teaching rooted in the love of Christ and the defense of the human being: a teaching heard by many non-believers and that will not be without fruit,” Vian wrote."
EWTN.com - Lay ministers
EWTN.com - Lay ministers: "Lay ministers
Is it proper or allowable for persons who are not Catholic or Christian, and who are practicing homosexuals, to conduct concerts and take part in other music ministries in a parish? We have a person who is conducting concerts and arranging programs that are given at our parish (and for which tickets are sold to raise funds) but he is anti Catholic and lives an openly gay lifestyle with a partner of some 15 years. This does not seem right to many of us. Is there anything in canon law that would forbid this?
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/16/2008:
Canon law is not a list of negative prohibitions that have imagined every possible crazy possibilibity.
However, prudence and a concern to avoid scandal might dictate what the law might not proscribe."
Is it proper or allowable for persons who are not Catholic or Christian, and who are practicing homosexuals, to conduct concerts and take part in other music ministries in a parish? We have a person who is conducting concerts and arranging programs that are given at our parish (and for which tickets are sold to raise funds) but he is anti Catholic and lives an openly gay lifestyle with a partner of some 15 years. This does not seem right to many of us. Is there anything in canon law that would forbid this?
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/16/2008:
Canon law is not a list of negative prohibitions that have imagined every possible crazy possibilibity.
However, prudence and a concern to avoid scandal might dictate what the law might not proscribe."
EWTN.com - Godparents and Sponsors
EWTN.com - Godparents and Sponsors: "Godparents and Sponsors
I read somewhere that Godparents should be Catholics who live their faith, and must be one male and one female or just one; cannot be two of the same gender. Is this true? What about Confirmation sponsors?
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/16/2008:
What you cite is accurate, except that only one godparent is needed for confirmation."
I read somewhere that Godparents should be Catholics who live their faith, and must be one male and one female or just one; cannot be two of the same gender. Is this true? What about Confirmation sponsors?
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/16/2008:
What you cite is accurate, except that only one godparent is needed for confirmation."
EWTN.com - What can laity do?
EWTN.com - What can laity do?: "What can laity do?
Please tell me what I can/should do about some people in my parish who not only leave mass right after receiving Communion, but they also heckle the priest during his homiies as though they are deliberately trying to provoke him. I can't find any 'official' teaching that specifically prohibits this deplorable behavior, so what are some steps I could take to stop this abuse?
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/17/2008:
I don't think there is much you can do to stop the rude behavior of some people; asking them to stop may even encourage them to do so even more. What I'd suggest is that you give as much support to your parish priest as you can, sending notes of encouragement, complimenting his homily after Mass, etc.
There may not be any 'official' teaching prohibiting such behavior, but common sense and decency should take precedence. Just because there's no specific rule against my hopping on one leg during Mass doesn't mean I should do it."
Please tell me what I can/should do about some people in my parish who not only leave mass right after receiving Communion, but they also heckle the priest during his homiies as though they are deliberately trying to provoke him. I can't find any 'official' teaching that specifically prohibits this deplorable behavior, so what are some steps I could take to stop this abuse?
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/17/2008:
I don't think there is much you can do to stop the rude behavior of some people; asking them to stop may even encourage them to do so even more. What I'd suggest is that you give as much support to your parish priest as you can, sending notes of encouragement, complimenting his homily after Mass, etc.
There may not be any 'official' teaching prohibiting such behavior, but common sense and decency should take precedence. Just because there's no specific rule against my hopping on one leg during Mass doesn't mean I should do it."
EWTN.com - Healing Prayers
EWTN.com - Healing Prayers: "Healing Prayers
I would like to have prayers on healing. Prayers for friends and family dealing with Cancer.
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/17/2008:
I know of no specific prayers, but that doesn't mean that there's none out there. Many parishes have 'St. Peregrine Masses', in honor of the Patron Saint of cancer patients. You may do some research on St. Peregrine and perhaps you'll get some prayers."
I would like to have prayers on healing. Prayers for friends and family dealing with Cancer.
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/17/2008:
I know of no specific prayers, but that doesn't mean that there's none out there. Many parishes have 'St. Peregrine Masses', in honor of the Patron Saint of cancer patients. You may do some research on St. Peregrine and perhaps you'll get some prayers."
EWTN.com - receiving communion
EWTN.com - receiving communion: "receiving communion
Can a Catholic receive Communion at a Lutheran Church? If not, what is the explanation?
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/17/2008:
No. Lutherans do not have the same beliefs and understanding as Catholics do with regards to the Eucharist. In addition, we believe that only a validly ordained Priest may say Mass and confect the Eucharist. For a Catholic to receive the Lutheran 'communion' would be to say that there's a unity between the Church and the Lutherans that does not yet exist."
Can a Catholic receive Communion at a Lutheran Church? If not, what is the explanation?
Answer by Fr. Jay Toborowsky on 10/17/2008:
No. Lutherans do not have the same beliefs and understanding as Catholics do with regards to the Eucharist. In addition, we believe that only a validly ordained Priest may say Mass and confect the Eucharist. For a Catholic to receive the Lutheran 'communion' would be to say that there's a unity between the Church and the Lutherans that does not yet exist."
EWTN.com - Animals in Heaven
EWTN.com - Animals in Heaven: "Animals in Heaven
I was looking up on q&a about animals in Heaven and and one person meantioned about Jesus riding on a white horse and then said that this means animals are in heaven Fr Lewis said that this is news to him (2005) Revelations chapter 19 says:
'11 And I saw heaven opened: and behold a white horse. And he that sat upon him was called faithful and true: and with justice doth he judge and fight. 12 And his eyes were as a flame of fire: and on his head were many diadems. And he had a name written, which no man knoweth but himself. 13 And he was clothed with a garment sprinkled with blood. And his name is called: THE WORD OF GOD. 14 And the armies that are in heaven followed him on white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean. 15 And out of his mouth proceedeth a sharp two-edged sword, that with it he may strike the nations. And he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness of the wrath of God the Almighty. 16 And he hath on his garment and on his thigh written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.' So who then is correct with the answer?
Answer by David Gregson on 10/16/2008:
The Book of Revelation has so much symbolism, it would be unwise to try to prove the existence of actual physical horses in heaven from the text you quote. Traditional Catholic theology would deny that animals can go to heaven when they die, since their souls aren't immortal.
Of course, that doesn't mean God couldn't create horses in heaven for his purposes, but it seems more likely that the horses spoken of in Rev. 19 symbolize the warlike character of the Lord's Second Coming, when He returns to earth to deliver the faithful from the attacks of the Evil One.
Nor does the traditional teaching against animals going to heaven rule out the possibility of their being raised on the new earth, when Christ comes again. See Animals in heaven."
I was looking up on q&a about animals in Heaven and and one person meantioned about Jesus riding on a white horse and then said that this means animals are in heaven Fr Lewis said that this is news to him (2005) Revelations chapter 19 says:
'11 And I saw heaven opened: and behold a white horse. And he that sat upon him was called faithful and true: and with justice doth he judge and fight. 12 And his eyes were as a flame of fire: and on his head were many diadems. And he had a name written, which no man knoweth but himself. 13 And he was clothed with a garment sprinkled with blood. And his name is called: THE WORD OF GOD. 14 And the armies that are in heaven followed him on white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean. 15 And out of his mouth proceedeth a sharp two-edged sword, that with it he may strike the nations. And he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness of the wrath of God the Almighty. 16 And he hath on his garment and on his thigh written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.' So who then is correct with the answer?
Answer by David Gregson on 10/16/2008:
The Book of Revelation has so much symbolism, it would be unwise to try to prove the existence of actual physical horses in heaven from the text you quote. Traditional Catholic theology would deny that animals can go to heaven when they die, since their souls aren't immortal.
Of course, that doesn't mean God couldn't create horses in heaven for his purposes, but it seems more likely that the horses spoken of in Rev. 19 symbolize the warlike character of the Lord's Second Coming, when He returns to earth to deliver the faithful from the attacks of the Evil One.
Nor does the traditional teaching against animals going to heaven rule out the possibility of their being raised on the new earth, when Christ comes again. See Animals in heaven."
EWTN.com - Abstainance on feast day
EWTN.com - Abstainance on feast day: "Abstainance on feast day
Greetings. My family and I observe Friday abstainance throughout the year, as we did not choose to substitute another form of pennance for Fridays outside of Lent. Therefore, since today is the Feast of the Assumption, are we still required to abstain from meat? I wasn't sure if the fact that it was a feast day took priority over the fact that it is a Friday (like if Christmas is on a Friday).
Thank you for your help.
Answer by David Gregson on 9/30/2008:
Any Solemnity would take precedence over Friday abstinence. The Solemnities that may fall on a Friday are:
Jan 1 - Mary Mother of God
Jan 6 - Epiphany (in U.S., usually transferred to Sunday)
Mar 19 - St. Joseph
Mar 25 - Annunciation
moveable - Sacred Heart
Jun 24 - Nativity St. John Baptist
Jun 29 - Sts. Peter and Paul
Aug 15 - Assumption
Nov 1 - All Saints
Dec 8 - Immaculate Conception
Dec 25 - Christmas"
Greetings. My family and I observe Friday abstainance throughout the year, as we did not choose to substitute another form of pennance for Fridays outside of Lent. Therefore, since today is the Feast of the Assumption, are we still required to abstain from meat? I wasn't sure if the fact that it was a feast day took priority over the fact that it is a Friday (like if Christmas is on a Friday).
Thank you for your help.
Answer by David Gregson on 9/30/2008:
Any Solemnity would take precedence over Friday abstinence. The Solemnities that may fall on a Friday are:
Jan 1 - Mary Mother of God
Jan 6 - Epiphany (in U.S., usually transferred to Sunday)
Mar 19 - St. Joseph
Mar 25 - Annunciation
moveable - Sacred Heart
Jun 24 - Nativity St. John Baptist
Jun 29 - Sts. Peter and Paul
Aug 15 - Assumption
Nov 1 - All Saints
Dec 8 - Immaculate Conception
Dec 25 - Christmas"
Pro-life news and information from American Life League
Pro-life news and information from American Life League: "AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF TRUTH FROM PUBLIC LIFE
Posted: Thursday October 16, 2008 at 11:02 am EST by Judie Brown
I guess it is no secret to most that the anti-faith organization, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, becomes wildly apoplectic whenever a religious leader speaks out. Especially when those leaders forcefully enunciate the truth of what the Catholic Church teaches through the guidance of Christ and the magisterium of the Church. My, oh my, how they do protest!
In a blatantly disrespectful and totally untruthful commentary entitled 'Texas Side Step: Bishops' Letter Attacking Pro-Choice Candidates Attempts To Sashay Past Federal Tax Law,' Rob Boston of AUSCS chronicles the events that provoked such vitriol from him and Barry Lynn, executive director of AUSCS, who publicly claimed, 'This is clearly an attempt on the part of these bishops to do an end-run around the federal tax law ban on electioneering by churches.'
There are those who would have us believe that there is a panoply of 'issues' Catholics should be concerned about and that killing a child in the womb is simply not all that important. Clearly, the fact that Bishop Kevin Vann and Bishop Kevin Farrell have chosen to enunciate Catholic teaching is not sitting well with them. While many of us understand why the right to life is the most fundamental of all human rights, there is clearly no unanimous opinion on this point, either from Mr. Lynn and his buddies or among Catholics, unfortunately!
More vitriol was being spewed at these faithful bishops in the Dallas Morning News religion blog, as illustrated by this woman's insidious comment:
CELIBATE...UNMARRIED...NEVER BEEN MARRIED... MEN promulgating 'decisions' about a WOMAN'S personal life and health issues...does anyone else see the ARROGANCE and SHEER STUPIDITY of this process?? raise your hands out there if you know of any RC families with only ONE or TWO children... think they ALL used natural family planning?? PSHAW!!
Comments like this are not necessarily representative of faithful Catholics, but they are typical of those who claim to be Catholic while holding views that not only contradict Catholic teaching but insult Christ and His shepherds. But for every inane comment like this one posted on the Dallas Morning News web site, many were posted by those whose admiration for the bishops inspired them to write in. Thank God for each of them—clearly, all is not lost!
What is lost, however, is a semblance of respect for the rights of the Catholic hierarchy to do the right thing, teach the truth and help those in their care to understand the importance of some concerns over others. This is why many bishops across the land have chosen to use this critical moment in America's history to speak the truth with love, but also with conviction. There is no compromise, and since when is that a crime or a violation of the law?
Americans United for Separation of Church and State cannot tolerate such courage and heroism. In his commentary, Boston argues ferociously and with misguided fervor,
So, less than three weeks before the election, bishops are issuing letters telling Catholics that they cannot vote for candidates who hold pro-choice views and remain in good standing in the church. That sure sounds to me like the church is favoring certain candidates over others and trying to affect the outcome of the race.
Here's where it gets interesting: The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) issues guidelines for political activity by churches. These guidelines, echoing federal tax law and interpretation by the Internal Revenue Service, warn, 'A Catholic organization may not directly or indirectly make any statement, in any medium, to endorse, support, or oppose any candidate for public office, political party, or PAC.'
Elsewhere the guidelines read, 'IRS acknowledges that an issue advocacy communication may constitute intervention in a political campaign through the use of code words, such as 'conservative', 'liberal', 'pro-life', 'pro-choice', 'anti-choice', 'Republican', or 'Democrat', coupled with a discussion of a candidacy or election, even if no candidate is specifically named. [emphasis in the AUSCS article] IRS advises that for an issue advocacy communication to violate the political campaign intervention prohibition, 'there must be some reasonably overt indication in the communication to the reader, viewer, or listener that the organization supports or opposes a particular candidate (or slate of candidates) in an election, rather than being a message restricted to an issue.''
It's great that the USCCB issues those political guidelines. It would be better if the bishops actually read and followed them.
First and foremost, every single ordained priest in this nation, including bishops, should be speaking out on these truths and the moral obligation that Catholics have to vote in accordance with Church teaching, because this is the best way for Catholics to be properly formed in their consciences prior to entering the voting booth. This has nothing to do with a particular candidate, but everything to do with bishops' and priests' obligation to nurture and feed the souls entrusted to them.
Second, the USCCB guidelines to which Mr. Boston refers do not in any way instruct bishops or priests that they must wear a muzzle and refrain from preaching truth during certain political seasons. That would be outrageous!
Finally, nothing in any bishop's statement that we have read has indicated an endorsement of, or direct opposition to, any political candidate. As a matter of fact, quite the opposite has been the case.
It would seem to me, at least, that Boston is having a real hard time understanding that, in moments like this, when Catholics so desperately want and need leadership, their bishops are called to provide it. It is further obvious that the entire structure of AUSCS is built on the premise that God has no place in public life, and that His Word and His truth simply must not be mentioned in any way. For if it were, the heathens among us might hear the truth and be drawn away from the hedonism in our midst.
To Mr. Boston and his ilk, I say, forget about it! Catholics have as much right to voice their faith in Christ and His teachings as do the heathens who condemn us.
Judie Brown"
Posted: Thursday October 16, 2008 at 11:02 am EST by Judie Brown
I guess it is no secret to most that the anti-faith organization, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, becomes wildly apoplectic whenever a religious leader speaks out. Especially when those leaders forcefully enunciate the truth of what the Catholic Church teaches through the guidance of Christ and the magisterium of the Church. My, oh my, how they do protest!
In a blatantly disrespectful and totally untruthful commentary entitled 'Texas Side Step: Bishops' Letter Attacking Pro-Choice Candidates Attempts To Sashay Past Federal Tax Law,' Rob Boston of AUSCS chronicles the events that provoked such vitriol from him and Barry Lynn, executive director of AUSCS, who publicly claimed, 'This is clearly an attempt on the part of these bishops to do an end-run around the federal tax law ban on electioneering by churches.'
There are those who would have us believe that there is a panoply of 'issues' Catholics should be concerned about and that killing a child in the womb is simply not all that important. Clearly, the fact that Bishop Kevin Vann and Bishop Kevin Farrell have chosen to enunciate Catholic teaching is not sitting well with them. While many of us understand why the right to life is the most fundamental of all human rights, there is clearly no unanimous opinion on this point, either from Mr. Lynn and his buddies or among Catholics, unfortunately!
More vitriol was being spewed at these faithful bishops in the Dallas Morning News religion blog, as illustrated by this woman's insidious comment:
CELIBATE...UNMARRIED...NEVER BEEN MARRIED... MEN promulgating 'decisions' about a WOMAN'S personal life and health issues...does anyone else see the ARROGANCE and SHEER STUPIDITY of this process?? raise your hands out there if you know of any RC families with only ONE or TWO children... think they ALL used natural family planning?? PSHAW!!
Comments like this are not necessarily representative of faithful Catholics, but they are typical of those who claim to be Catholic while holding views that not only contradict Catholic teaching but insult Christ and His shepherds. But for every inane comment like this one posted on the Dallas Morning News web site, many were posted by those whose admiration for the bishops inspired them to write in. Thank God for each of them—clearly, all is not lost!
What is lost, however, is a semblance of respect for the rights of the Catholic hierarchy to do the right thing, teach the truth and help those in their care to understand the importance of some concerns over others. This is why many bishops across the land have chosen to use this critical moment in America's history to speak the truth with love, but also with conviction. There is no compromise, and since when is that a crime or a violation of the law?
Americans United for Separation of Church and State cannot tolerate such courage and heroism. In his commentary, Boston argues ferociously and with misguided fervor,
So, less than three weeks before the election, bishops are issuing letters telling Catholics that they cannot vote for candidates who hold pro-choice views and remain in good standing in the church. That sure sounds to me like the church is favoring certain candidates over others and trying to affect the outcome of the race.
Here's where it gets interesting: The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) issues guidelines for political activity by churches. These guidelines, echoing federal tax law and interpretation by the Internal Revenue Service, warn, 'A Catholic organization may not directly or indirectly make any statement, in any medium, to endorse, support, or oppose any candidate for public office, political party, or PAC.'
Elsewhere the guidelines read, 'IRS acknowledges that an issue advocacy communication may constitute intervention in a political campaign through the use of code words, such as 'conservative', 'liberal', 'pro-life', 'pro-choice', 'anti-choice', 'Republican', or 'Democrat', coupled with a discussion of a candidacy or election, even if no candidate is specifically named. [emphasis in the AUSCS article] IRS advises that for an issue advocacy communication to violate the political campaign intervention prohibition, 'there must be some reasonably overt indication in the communication to the reader, viewer, or listener that the organization supports or opposes a particular candidate (or slate of candidates) in an election, rather than being a message restricted to an issue.''
It's great that the USCCB issues those political guidelines. It would be better if the bishops actually read and followed them.
First and foremost, every single ordained priest in this nation, including bishops, should be speaking out on these truths and the moral obligation that Catholics have to vote in accordance with Church teaching, because this is the best way for Catholics to be properly formed in their consciences prior to entering the voting booth. This has nothing to do with a particular candidate, but everything to do with bishops' and priests' obligation to nurture and feed the souls entrusted to them.
Second, the USCCB guidelines to which Mr. Boston refers do not in any way instruct bishops or priests that they must wear a muzzle and refrain from preaching truth during certain political seasons. That would be outrageous!
Finally, nothing in any bishop's statement that we have read has indicated an endorsement of, or direct opposition to, any political candidate. As a matter of fact, quite the opposite has been the case.
It would seem to me, at least, that Boston is having a real hard time understanding that, in moments like this, when Catholics so desperately want and need leadership, their bishops are called to provide it. It is further obvious that the entire structure of AUSCS is built on the premise that God has no place in public life, and that His Word and His truth simply must not be mentioned in any way. For if it were, the heathens among us might hear the truth and be drawn away from the hedonism in our midst.
To Mr. Boston and his ilk, I say, forget about it! Catholics have as much right to voice their faith in Christ and His teachings as do the heathens who condemn us.
Judie Brown"
Abortion must be addressed ‘for the survival of African American people,’Catholic bishop asserts
Abortion must be addressed ‘for the survival of African American people,’Catholic bishop asserts: "Abortion must be addressed ‘for the survival of African American people,’Catholic bishop asserts
Bishop Martin Holley
Washington DC, Oct 16, 2008 / 02:33 am (CNA).- Responding to information from the Guttmacher Institute reporting that black woman have abortions at five times the rate of white women, Bishop Martin D. Holley, Auxiliary Bishop of Washington called on African Americans to rededicate themselves to family, prayer and the dignity of the human person.
'As an African American, I am saddened by evidence that Black women continue to be targeted by the abortion industry,” the bishop began in a statement. “The loss of any child from abortion is a tragedy, but we must ask: Why are minority children being aborted at such disproportionate rates?'
The prelate stressed that since the Roe v. Wade decision, “the number one cause of death in the African American community has been abortion.” Because of this, “we have lost over 13 million lives. To put that in perspective, it is one third of our present Black population. Since 1973, twice as many Black Americans have died from abortion than from AIDS, accidents, violent crimes, cancer, and heart disease combined.”
Abortion is an issue that must not be pushed to the back burner, he insisted. “It clearly must be at the heart and center of our discussion of the survival of African American people.”
Bishop Holley, who also serves as Chair of the Sub-Committee on African American Affairs and is a member of the Committee on Pro-Life Activities of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), went on to call for the federal de-funding of the abortion industry.
'Every year the federal government gives over $300 million to Planned Parenthood. Last year for the first time, Planned Parenthood took in over one billion dollars and reported a profit of $51 million,' he said of the non-profit organization.
“We must demand an end to the victimizing of African American children, women, families and communities by Planned Parenthood and others in the abortion industry. Over 80 percent of Planned Parenthood clinics are located in minority neighborhoods,” Bishop Holley continued. He then referred to the well-documented evidence that the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, began the ‘Negro Project’ to reduce the Black population.
Additionally, “we should be shocked and heartbroken by the findings of a recent phone investigation, that recorded a fundraiser at an Iowa Planned Parenthood clinic saying she was ‘very excited’ about a donation specifically for aborting Black babies.”
The bishop concluded by encouraging African Americans to 'defend our community by rededicating ourselves to family life and marriage, promoting the gift of chastity and marital fidelity, committing ourselves to prayer and service to others and defending the life and dignity of each human person. We can welcome every child as a gift and we can overcome abortion.'"
Bishop Martin Holley
Washington DC, Oct 16, 2008 / 02:33 am (CNA).- Responding to information from the Guttmacher Institute reporting that black woman have abortions at five times the rate of white women, Bishop Martin D. Holley, Auxiliary Bishop of Washington called on African Americans to rededicate themselves to family, prayer and the dignity of the human person.
'As an African American, I am saddened by evidence that Black women continue to be targeted by the abortion industry,” the bishop began in a statement. “The loss of any child from abortion is a tragedy, but we must ask: Why are minority children being aborted at such disproportionate rates?'
The prelate stressed that since the Roe v. Wade decision, “the number one cause of death in the African American community has been abortion.” Because of this, “we have lost over 13 million lives. To put that in perspective, it is one third of our present Black population. Since 1973, twice as many Black Americans have died from abortion than from AIDS, accidents, violent crimes, cancer, and heart disease combined.”
Abortion is an issue that must not be pushed to the back burner, he insisted. “It clearly must be at the heart and center of our discussion of the survival of African American people.”
Bishop Holley, who also serves as Chair of the Sub-Committee on African American Affairs and is a member of the Committee on Pro-Life Activities of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), went on to call for the federal de-funding of the abortion industry.
'Every year the federal government gives over $300 million to Planned Parenthood. Last year for the first time, Planned Parenthood took in over one billion dollars and reported a profit of $51 million,' he said of the non-profit organization.
“We must demand an end to the victimizing of African American children, women, families and communities by Planned Parenthood and others in the abortion industry. Over 80 percent of Planned Parenthood clinics are located in minority neighborhoods,” Bishop Holley continued. He then referred to the well-documented evidence that the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, began the ‘Negro Project’ to reduce the Black population.
Additionally, “we should be shocked and heartbroken by the findings of a recent phone investigation, that recorded a fundraiser at an Iowa Planned Parenthood clinic saying she was ‘very excited’ about a donation specifically for aborting Black babies.”
The bishop concluded by encouraging African Americans to 'defend our community by rededicating ourselves to family life and marriage, promoting the gift of chastity and marital fidelity, committing ourselves to prayer and service to others and defending the life and dignity of each human person. We can welcome every child as a gift and we can overcome abortion.'"
EWTN.com - Mortal sin
EWTN.com - Mortal sin: "Mortal sin
Judie,
Is it a mortal sin to vote for someone who is not 100% pro life and supports embryonic stem cell research? We don't hear about mortal sin in church very often. We appreciate the truth.
Charles
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/14/2008:
Dear Anonymous
I cannot imagine that it would be a mortal sin, as long as you examined your reasons for casting that vote and did so with a clear conscience.
My personal choice would be to avoid voting for such a person.
Judie Brown"
Judie,
Is it a mortal sin to vote for someone who is not 100% pro life and supports embryonic stem cell research? We don't hear about mortal sin in church very often. We appreciate the truth.
Charles
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/14/2008:
Dear Anonymous
I cannot imagine that it would be a mortal sin, as long as you examined your reasons for casting that vote and did so with a clear conscience.
My personal choice would be to avoid voting for such a person.
Judie Brown"
EWTN.com - eatting AFTER communion
EWTN.com - eatting AFTER communion: "eatting AFTER communion
Question from BT on 10/12/2008:
Is there a 'time limit' as to when you can eat or drink after communion as there is before?
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/14/2008:
No. You can eat immediately after Mass."
Question from BT on 10/12/2008:
Is there a 'time limit' as to when you can eat or drink after communion as there is before?
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/14/2008:
No. You can eat immediately after Mass."
EWTN.com - Renewal of Baptismal Vows...
EWTN.com - Renewal of Baptismal Vows...: "Renewal of Baptismal Vows...
I did something very stupid. About a year ago I was dating a Ukranian Pentecostal man who I sincerely thought was the one sent for me by God. The only way I felt I would gain approval from his parents and be able to marry him was if I renewed my baptismal vows in his church, though I did not want to abandon my Catholic faith. I thought if I simply say the 'renewal of baptismal vows' prayer when they do the ceremony I won't be denying my Catholic baptism only renewing my vow to God that was made at my original one. I almost walked out the night of the ceremony but didn't and went through with the ceremony. Though I made it clear to those at the Church my Catholic faith and my intentions.
Now, I have deep, deep regrets for doing this. Now, I am with the man who truly is sent for me by God and though he is Protestant has agreed to raise our children Catholic and would never under any circumstances ask me to sacrifice my beliefs for him or for anyone in his family for that matter. Even his family wouldn't and they all love me.
I need to know if I am still considered Catholic according to Church law even after doing this. I know I was wrong, I didn't mean any harm. I was only trying to find some peace in my soul in a very painful situation. Plus, I never allowed them to consider me converted over to Pentecostal because I denied membership in the church.
What can I do or what do I have to do to make this right again? If I am not mistaken the Pentecostal Church kept no record of the ceremony because I denied membership. His sister was baptized months after we were broken up and she received a certificant honoring the event and I did not.
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/14/2008:
Your prior marrige is invalid due to defect of form.
You are still a Catholic, although you may need to go to confession.
God does not send partners for marriage. This sounds like a bit of magical thinking. People freely chose partners for marrige for themselves. God gives us free will."
I did something very stupid. About a year ago I was dating a Ukranian Pentecostal man who I sincerely thought was the one sent for me by God. The only way I felt I would gain approval from his parents and be able to marry him was if I renewed my baptismal vows in his church, though I did not want to abandon my Catholic faith. I thought if I simply say the 'renewal of baptismal vows' prayer when they do the ceremony I won't be denying my Catholic baptism only renewing my vow to God that was made at my original one. I almost walked out the night of the ceremony but didn't and went through with the ceremony. Though I made it clear to those at the Church my Catholic faith and my intentions.
Now, I have deep, deep regrets for doing this. Now, I am with the man who truly is sent for me by God and though he is Protestant has agreed to raise our children Catholic and would never under any circumstances ask me to sacrifice my beliefs for him or for anyone in his family for that matter. Even his family wouldn't and they all love me.
I need to know if I am still considered Catholic according to Church law even after doing this. I know I was wrong, I didn't mean any harm. I was only trying to find some peace in my soul in a very painful situation. Plus, I never allowed them to consider me converted over to Pentecostal because I denied membership in the church.
What can I do or what do I have to do to make this right again? If I am not mistaken the Pentecostal Church kept no record of the ceremony because I denied membership. His sister was baptized months after we were broken up and she received a certificant honoring the event and I did not.
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/14/2008:
Your prior marrige is invalid due to defect of form.
You are still a Catholic, although you may need to go to confession.
God does not send partners for marriage. This sounds like a bit of magical thinking. People freely chose partners for marrige for themselves. God gives us free will."
EWTN.com - Purification of vessels after Holy Mass
EWTN.com - Purification of vessels after Holy Mass: "Purification of vessels after Holy Mass
Question from Angry Altar Boy on 10/11/2008:
I am a 17 year old Altar boy at my parish. I am also discerning a vocation to the priesthood. At Mass there was precious blood left in a EMHC Chalice after Mass it was taken in back to the sacristy. The Altar workers didn't know what to do with him. By then the priest had already left. I reverently consumed the precious blood. Was I alright in doing this. They planned to dilute the blood with water and pour it down the sink, not a secrarium. I understand only an isitituted acolyete may purify the vessels but if I were to open the sacristy cupboard, I could make a holy hour because I know that the particles of the Blessed Sacrament are still in Patens, Ciboriums etc...
Please help!
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/14/2008:
I think that you need to discuss this situation with your pastor. It is very serious to leave the Eucharist as you have described."
Question from Angry Altar Boy on 10/11/2008:
I am a 17 year old Altar boy at my parish. I am also discerning a vocation to the priesthood. At Mass there was precious blood left in a EMHC Chalice after Mass it was taken in back to the sacristy. The Altar workers didn't know what to do with him. By then the priest had already left. I reverently consumed the precious blood. Was I alright in doing this. They planned to dilute the blood with water and pour it down the sink, not a secrarium. I understand only an isitituted acolyete may purify the vessels but if I were to open the sacristy cupboard, I could make a holy hour because I know that the particles of the Blessed Sacrament are still in Patens, Ciboriums etc...
Please help!
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/14/2008:
I think that you need to discuss this situation with your pastor. It is very serious to leave the Eucharist as you have described."
Abortion supporters are outside the Church, says Mexican cardinal
Abortion supporters are outside the Church, says Mexican cardinal: "Abortion supporters are outside the Church, says Mexican cardinal
Cardinal Juan Sandoval Iniguez
Mexico City, Oct 14, 2008 / 11:51 am (CNA).- The Archbishop of Guadalajara, Cardinal Juan Sandoval Iniguez, said this week those who promote and approve laws in favor of abortion are outside the Catholic Church and should not receive Communion.
During his homily at the Mass in honor of Our Lady of Zapopan, the cardinal encouraged those present to defend life from conception to natural death.
“Abortion defenders will not go to the eternal banquet, murderers will not go to the eternal banquet, the unjust who strip the poor of everything and leave them to die of hunger and illness will not go the eternal banquet either, because they are against life,” Cardinal Iniguez explained.
Before the hundreds of faithful gathered in the church, the cardinal stated, “Three years ago in Rome [the Church] said that those who do not defend life and who promote abortion and similar things through laws should not approach to receive Communion. They are not worthy to receive this sacred mystery.”
Likewise, the cardinal reminded those present that the intention of their celebration was to “pray to the Virgin for respect for life and the family, which is the sanctuary of life, it is where life is born and grows.”"
Cardinal Juan Sandoval Iniguez
Mexico City, Oct 14, 2008 / 11:51 am (CNA).- The Archbishop of Guadalajara, Cardinal Juan Sandoval Iniguez, said this week those who promote and approve laws in favor of abortion are outside the Catholic Church and should not receive Communion.
During his homily at the Mass in honor of Our Lady of Zapopan, the cardinal encouraged those present to defend life from conception to natural death.
“Abortion defenders will not go to the eternal banquet, murderers will not go to the eternal banquet, the unjust who strip the poor of everything and leave them to die of hunger and illness will not go the eternal banquet either, because they are against life,” Cardinal Iniguez explained.
Before the hundreds of faithful gathered in the church, the cardinal stated, “Three years ago in Rome [the Church] said that those who do not defend life and who promote abortion and similar things through laws should not approach to receive Communion. They are not worthy to receive this sacred mystery.”
Likewise, the cardinal reminded those present that the intention of their celebration was to “pray to the Virgin for respect for life and the family, which is the sanctuary of life, it is where life is born and grows.”"
Connecticut Bishops Protest Legalization of Same-Sex "Marriage" | Catholics For The Common Good
Connecticut Bishops Protest Legalization of Same-Sex "Marriage" | Catholics For The Common Good: "Connecticut Bishops Protest Legalization of Same-Sex 'Marriage'
Marriage Amendments on the November ballot
California
Arizona
Florida
Connecticut Court Follows California, Massachusetts Lead
HARTFORD, Connecticut, October 12, 2008 --Prelates from Connecticut lamented what they called a situation of just four people choosing to redefine the institution of marriage for their whole state.
The bishops decried a 4-3 Connecticut Supreme Court vote on Friday that opens the state to becoming the third to allow same-sex marriages. Massachusetts and California already have redefined the legal understanding of marriage.
A statement from the Connecticut Catholic Conference, offered 'on behalf of the Catholic bishops, clergy, religious and laity of the state of Connecticut -- more than 1.3 million people,' expressed disappointment 'in this close 4-3 decision by the Connecticut Supreme Court, which imposes the recognition of same-sex marriage upon the people of Connecticut. This decision is in direct conflict with the position of our state legislature and courts of other states and is a terribly regrettable exercise in judicial activism.'
'Four people have not just extended a supposed civil right to a particular class of individuals, but have chosen to redefine the institution of marriage,' the statement said. 'The Connecticut Supreme Court has taken upon itself to make a determination that other courts throughout our nation have felt should be made through the political process. [...]
'It appears our state Supreme Court has forgotten that courts should interpret laws and legislatures should make laws.'
The Catholic Conference further warned that the decision 'raises a very real concern about the infringement on religious liberty and freedom of speech with the judicial imposition of same-sex marriage.'
'The real battle in this court case was not about rights, since civil unions provide a vast number of legal rights to same-sex couples, but about conferring and enforcing social acceptance of a particular lifestyle; a lifestyle many people of faith and advocates of the natural law refuse to accept,' the statement affirmed.
The Catholic Conference is now encouraging citizens to vote for a Constitutional Convention on election day, which they hope could pave the way for a definition of marriage as exclusively between a man and woman."
Marriage Amendments on the November ballot
California
Arizona
Florida
Connecticut Court Follows California, Massachusetts Lead
HARTFORD, Connecticut, October 12, 2008 --Prelates from Connecticut lamented what they called a situation of just four people choosing to redefine the institution of marriage for their whole state.
The bishops decried a 4-3 Connecticut Supreme Court vote on Friday that opens the state to becoming the third to allow same-sex marriages. Massachusetts and California already have redefined the legal understanding of marriage.
A statement from the Connecticut Catholic Conference, offered 'on behalf of the Catholic bishops, clergy, religious and laity of the state of Connecticut -- more than 1.3 million people,' expressed disappointment 'in this close 4-3 decision by the Connecticut Supreme Court, which imposes the recognition of same-sex marriage upon the people of Connecticut. This decision is in direct conflict with the position of our state legislature and courts of other states and is a terribly regrettable exercise in judicial activism.'
'Four people have not just extended a supposed civil right to a particular class of individuals, but have chosen to redefine the institution of marriage,' the statement said. 'The Connecticut Supreme Court has taken upon itself to make a determination that other courts throughout our nation have felt should be made through the political process. [...]
'It appears our state Supreme Court has forgotten that courts should interpret laws and legislatures should make laws.'
The Catholic Conference further warned that the decision 'raises a very real concern about the infringement on religious liberty and freedom of speech with the judicial imposition of same-sex marriage.'
'The real battle in this court case was not about rights, since civil unions provide a vast number of legal rights to same-sex couples, but about conferring and enforcing social acceptance of a particular lifestyle; a lifestyle many people of faith and advocates of the natural law refuse to accept,' the statement affirmed.
The Catholic Conference is now encouraging citizens to vote for a Constitutional Convention on election day, which they hope could pave the way for a definition of marriage as exclusively between a man and woman."
Lawsuit claims California college threatened to expel students who prayed
Lawsuit claims California college threatened to expel students who prayed: "Lawsuit claims California college threatened to expel students who prayed
Alameda County, CA, Oct 12, 2008 / 08:27 pm (CNA).- Two students filed a federal lawsuit this past Monday against the publicly-funded College of Alameda alleging that school officials at the California school threatened to expel them for praying.
The events prompting the lawsuit took place in December, 2007, a press release from the Pacific Justice Institute reports.
That month, student Kandy Kyriacou visited an instructor to give her a Christmas gift. Kyriacou found the instructor alone in her shared office. When the instructor indicated she was ill, Kyriacou offered to pray for her.
The instructor bowed her head and Kyriacou began to pray. They were then interrupted by another faculty member, Derek Piazza, who entered the room and said “You can’t be doing that here!”
Kyriacou left to join her friend and fellow student Ojoma Omaga. Piazza followed Kyriacou and repeated his rebuke. The students related that they were surprised by his intimidating behavior.
Three days before Christmas, both students received letters notifying them of the college’s retroactive “intent to suspend” them. While school policy requires such letters to state factual bases for the charges, the letter only vaguely accused the students of “disruptive or insulting behavior, willful disobedience . . . persistent abuse of college employees.”
An administrative hearing reportedly found Kyriacou’s prayer worthy of discipline and threatened suspension or expulsion for further infractions.
The students turned to the Pacific Justice Institute (PJI) for assistance. PJI attorneys attempted to resolve the situation through demand letters, but the college did not respond.
PJI local affiliate attorneys Steven N. H. Wood and Christopher Schweickert made a final demand that college officials rescind disciplinary letters and acknowledge the students’ right to pray, but the college refused. On Monday, Wood, Schweickert, and PJI staff attorneys filed a federal lawsuit.
'It's outrageous,' PJI President Brad Dacus stated. 'Since when does praying for a sick teacher to get well - with her consent - earn a suspension? This is not just a constitutional violation; it is a complete lack of common sense. These students were not looking for a fight, but since the school to this day insists that it can expel them if they pray again, we will have to resolve it in federal court.'
CNA spoke with Dacus in a Friday interview. Dacus said there had been no further progress on the case since the Monday filing.
“We’re starting the long litigation process,” he said.
“Defending the rights of students to pray in public places or in colleges or universities is the most fundamental protection of the free exercise of religion that we can imagine.
“These student’s rights were clearly violated, and they must be vindicated in the court of law,” Dacus told CNA."
Alameda County, CA, Oct 12, 2008 / 08:27 pm (CNA).- Two students filed a federal lawsuit this past Monday against the publicly-funded College of Alameda alleging that school officials at the California school threatened to expel them for praying.
The events prompting the lawsuit took place in December, 2007, a press release from the Pacific Justice Institute reports.
That month, student Kandy Kyriacou visited an instructor to give her a Christmas gift. Kyriacou found the instructor alone in her shared office. When the instructor indicated she was ill, Kyriacou offered to pray for her.
The instructor bowed her head and Kyriacou began to pray. They were then interrupted by another faculty member, Derek Piazza, who entered the room and said “You can’t be doing that here!”
Kyriacou left to join her friend and fellow student Ojoma Omaga. Piazza followed Kyriacou and repeated his rebuke. The students related that they were surprised by his intimidating behavior.
Three days before Christmas, both students received letters notifying them of the college’s retroactive “intent to suspend” them. While school policy requires such letters to state factual bases for the charges, the letter only vaguely accused the students of “disruptive or insulting behavior, willful disobedience . . . persistent abuse of college employees.”
An administrative hearing reportedly found Kyriacou’s prayer worthy of discipline and threatened suspension or expulsion for further infractions.
The students turned to the Pacific Justice Institute (PJI) for assistance. PJI attorneys attempted to resolve the situation through demand letters, but the college did not respond.
PJI local affiliate attorneys Steven N. H. Wood and Christopher Schweickert made a final demand that college officials rescind disciplinary letters and acknowledge the students’ right to pray, but the college refused. On Monday, Wood, Schweickert, and PJI staff attorneys filed a federal lawsuit.
'It's outrageous,' PJI President Brad Dacus stated. 'Since when does praying for a sick teacher to get well - with her consent - earn a suspension? This is not just a constitutional violation; it is a complete lack of common sense. These students were not looking for a fight, but since the school to this day insists that it can expel them if they pray again, we will have to resolve it in federal court.'
CNA spoke with Dacus in a Friday interview. Dacus said there had been no further progress on the case since the Monday filing.
“We’re starting the long litigation process,” he said.
“Defending the rights of students to pray in public places or in colleges or universities is the most fundamental protection of the free exercise of religion that we can imagine.
“These student’s rights were clearly violated, and they must be vindicated in the court of law,” Dacus told CNA."
EWTN.com - Death of Spouse
EWTN.com - Death of Spouse: "Death of Spouse
The newspapers have carried the story of a missing person whose remains have just been discovered. He was declared dead by a civil court a few months earlier. I was wondering if Canon law follows civil law and would permit a Catholic to remarry after a civil court declared the spouse dead ? I was told that after the sinking of the Titanic most of those missing were declared dead and there families were permitted to administer their estates in a rather short time. Would the same civil ruling aply to the spouse in order for her to remarry?
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/10/2008:
Canon law has a specific procedure for situations of a presumed death of a spouse in situations where the death is somewhat ambiguous. I would think that, in such a process, the findings of a civil court might be strong evidence and perhaps fully probative for the canonical process."
The newspapers have carried the story of a missing person whose remains have just been discovered. He was declared dead by a civil court a few months earlier. I was wondering if Canon law follows civil law and would permit a Catholic to remarry after a civil court declared the spouse dead ? I was told that after the sinking of the Titanic most of those missing were declared dead and there families were permitted to administer their estates in a rather short time. Would the same civil ruling aply to the spouse in order for her to remarry?
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/10/2008:
Canon law has a specific procedure for situations of a presumed death of a spouse in situations where the death is somewhat ambiguous. I would think that, in such a process, the findings of a civil court might be strong evidence and perhaps fully probative for the canonical process."
EWTN.com - Children's Liturgy
EWTN.com - Children's Liturgy: "Children's Liturgy
Dear Father,
We have a children's liturgy of the Word in our parish. We have a rota of people to lead it. There is a variance of opinion amongst the leaders about the required elements of the liturgy for children. Some include a simplified penitential rite, a Gloria, an Alleluia and the Gospel. Others dispense with all these elements and lead an activity on the theme of the day (eg on Rosary Sunday they may simply focus on the Rosary).
We are in the UK and we have no official children's lectionary as far as I am aware.
My question is: Which (if any) elements are necessary in the children's liturgy of the Word? Does the exclusion of any of them impact on the fulfilling of the Sunday obligation - either for the children or for the adults who assist?
Many thanks for your help.
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/10/2008:
The Directory for Masses with Children Pueros Baptizatos gives the directives for how children's liturgy of the words are to be celebrated.
Those elements that a part of the Introductory Rites are not to be included in the children's Liturgy of the Word. So excluded are the penitential rite and Gloria.
The children's Liturgy of the Word should include ordinarily at least one reading before the gospel, the singing of a psalm, alleluia, the gospel, a homily-like talk, the creed (including the possibility of the Apostles' Creed), and general intercessions. There are published approved children's lectionaries that have simplied versions of the readings that are easier to understand. If this is not the case in the UK, then the regular lectionary must be used. Obviously the talk and the general intercessions should be prepared according to the mentality of children.
I would emphasize that a children's Liturgy of the Word should still be a liturgy, like what is going on during the Mass for the rest of the assembly. It should not be a time for art and crafts and it is not a catechism class. It should give the children a Liturgy of the Word that they understand and help them understand more fully what is happening in a usual Liturgy of the Word.
Those who participate in a children's Liturgy of the Word, both adults and children, fulfill their Sunday obligation.
However, in my experience, many adults who lead children's liturgies of the word decide on their own to attend another Mass so that they can also benefit from the homily. However, this would not be strictly required."
Dear Father,
We have a children's liturgy of the Word in our parish. We have a rota of people to lead it. There is a variance of opinion amongst the leaders about the required elements of the liturgy for children. Some include a simplified penitential rite, a Gloria, an Alleluia and the Gospel. Others dispense with all these elements and lead an activity on the theme of the day (eg on Rosary Sunday they may simply focus on the Rosary).
We are in the UK and we have no official children's lectionary as far as I am aware.
My question is: Which (if any) elements are necessary in the children's liturgy of the Word? Does the exclusion of any of them impact on the fulfilling of the Sunday obligation - either for the children or for the adults who assist?
Many thanks for your help.
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/10/2008:
The Directory for Masses with Children Pueros Baptizatos gives the directives for how children's liturgy of the words are to be celebrated.
Those elements that a part of the Introductory Rites are not to be included in the children's Liturgy of the Word. So excluded are the penitential rite and Gloria.
The children's Liturgy of the Word should include ordinarily at least one reading before the gospel, the singing of a psalm, alleluia, the gospel, a homily-like talk, the creed (including the possibility of the Apostles' Creed), and general intercessions. There are published approved children's lectionaries that have simplied versions of the readings that are easier to understand. If this is not the case in the UK, then the regular lectionary must be used. Obviously the talk and the general intercessions should be prepared according to the mentality of children.
I would emphasize that a children's Liturgy of the Word should still be a liturgy, like what is going on during the Mass for the rest of the assembly. It should not be a time for art and crafts and it is not a catechism class. It should give the children a Liturgy of the Word that they understand and help them understand more fully what is happening in a usual Liturgy of the Word.
Those who participate in a children's Liturgy of the Word, both adults and children, fulfill their Sunday obligation.
However, in my experience, many adults who lead children's liturgies of the word decide on their own to attend another Mass so that they can also benefit from the homily. However, this would not be strictly required."
EWTN.com - Nullity of Marriage
EWTN.com - Nullity of Marriage: "Nullity of Marriage
My husband and I were married legally outside the Church and then had our marriage blessed inside the Church. We have been married for six years.
My husband has been through a rough upbringing. Mother committed suicide when he was 7 y.o., and father is an alcoholic. His 4 brothers all have mental illness, Bipolar Manic, Schizophrenia, Depression. I believe my husband suffers from at least depression. He has seen a psychiatrist in the past, but refuses to continue to see him and will not take any medications for depression. My husband after much prompting from me is finally seaking spiritual direction, praise God. However, am I a doubting Thomas for having hope in this marriage? In other words, my husband doesn't love his neighbor. He says he loves God, but how can he love God if he doesn't love his neighbor. The doubt comes in and I think, if he doesn't therefore love God, how can he truly love me? I have a lot of health issues with autoimmune disease and the stress of this relationship in the past has not been good for my physical and emotional health. Please advise and God Bless.
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/10/2008:
Especially considering the psychological factors involved, I would be cautious of judging your husband's ability or intention to love. Jesus teaches that we need to love both God and neighbor, but just the fact that he stresses that they need to go together implicitly acknowledges the fact that, for some people, they do not.
After all, we might be called to love everyone. But in reality, we do not. We might love some people and not others. Your husband very well might love you but not certain others. He also might have feelings and intentions of love but have difficulties expressing this. I really don't know, but I'd encourage you not to assume the worse."
My husband and I were married legally outside the Church and then had our marriage blessed inside the Church. We have been married for six years.
My husband has been through a rough upbringing. Mother committed suicide when he was 7 y.o., and father is an alcoholic. His 4 brothers all have mental illness, Bipolar Manic, Schizophrenia, Depression. I believe my husband suffers from at least depression. He has seen a psychiatrist in the past, but refuses to continue to see him and will not take any medications for depression. My husband after much prompting from me is finally seaking spiritual direction, praise God. However, am I a doubting Thomas for having hope in this marriage? In other words, my husband doesn't love his neighbor. He says he loves God, but how can he love God if he doesn't love his neighbor. The doubt comes in and I think, if he doesn't therefore love God, how can he truly love me? I have a lot of health issues with autoimmune disease and the stress of this relationship in the past has not been good for my physical and emotional health. Please advise and God Bless.
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/10/2008:
Especially considering the psychological factors involved, I would be cautious of judging your husband's ability or intention to love. Jesus teaches that we need to love both God and neighbor, but just the fact that he stresses that they need to go together implicitly acknowledges the fact that, for some people, they do not.
After all, we might be called to love everyone. But in reality, we do not. We might love some people and not others. Your husband very well might love you but not certain others. He also might have feelings and intentions of love but have difficulties expressing this. I really don't know, but I'd encourage you not to assume the worse."
Church urges values be included in sexual education program
Church urges values be included in sexual education program: "Church urges values be included in sexual education program
San Salvador, Oct 9, 2008 / 09:02 pm (CNA).- Archbishop Fernando Saenz Lacalle of San Salvador has called on the presidents of Latin America to include the issue of human values when they hold a discussion on a project about the rights of young people in late October.
The 18th Latin American Summit of Heads of State will take place in San Salvador October 29—31 and will focus on the issue of “Young People and Development.”
“It is very important that at the Latin American level there be agreement about policy, about the guidance being given to young people, and therefore this Summit is positive,” Archbishop Saenz Lacalle said. The leaders “should include in their discussions the defense of human values and concretely there should be a special reference to the family.”
In addressing plans for a “sexual and reproductive education” program, he said, the leaders “should opt for true education and not perversion, which could occur.”"
San Salvador, Oct 9, 2008 / 09:02 pm (CNA).- Archbishop Fernando Saenz Lacalle of San Salvador has called on the presidents of Latin America to include the issue of human values when they hold a discussion on a project about the rights of young people in late October.
The 18th Latin American Summit of Heads of State will take place in San Salvador October 29—31 and will focus on the issue of “Young People and Development.”
“It is very important that at the Latin American level there be agreement about policy, about the guidance being given to young people, and therefore this Summit is positive,” Archbishop Saenz Lacalle said. The leaders “should include in their discussions the defense of human values and concretely there should be a special reference to the family.”
In addressing plans for a “sexual and reproductive education” program, he said, the leaders “should opt for true education and not perversion, which could occur.”"
EWTN.com - heaven for non-Catholics
EWTN.com - heaven for non-Catholics: "heaven for non-Catholics
What does the Church say about people-other Christians of different faiths-and heaven? Also, if a person is not a Christian, meaning not baptized, but lives a moral, christian-like life, does he/she go to Heaven and will experience the joys of Heaven that Catholics believe?
Answer by Fr. John Echert on 10/8/2008:
One must die in a state of grace within the Catholic Church for salvation. Now the Church leaves open the possibility that there may be souls joined to the Church through a spiritual communion, even though not formally joined. This would be particularly likely in the case of those intending to become Catholic but who die without baptism. Theologians also speculate about those who have invincible ignorance and live moral lives, though this is not a settled matter by any formal teaching of the Church. We ultimately leave it to God but given the Apostolic view of the necessity of Christ for salvation I would not want to take a chance by another route other than the Church.
Thanks, John
Father Echert"
What does the Church say about people-other Christians of different faiths-and heaven? Also, if a person is not a Christian, meaning not baptized, but lives a moral, christian-like life, does he/she go to Heaven and will experience the joys of Heaven that Catholics believe?
Answer by Fr. John Echert on 10/8/2008:
One must die in a state of grace within the Catholic Church for salvation. Now the Church leaves open the possibility that there may be souls joined to the Church through a spiritual communion, even though not formally joined. This would be particularly likely in the case of those intending to become Catholic but who die without baptism. Theologians also speculate about those who have invincible ignorance and live moral lives, though this is not a settled matter by any formal teaching of the Church. We ultimately leave it to God but given the Apostolic view of the necessity of Christ for salvation I would not want to take a chance by another route other than the Church.
Thanks, John
Father Echert"
EWTN.com - Gospel Reading during Mass
EWTN.com - Gospel Reading during Mass: "Gospel Reading during Mass
I attend Mass where the priest says the Mass but a religious brother reads the Gospel and gives the homily. Isn't that the exclusive duty of the priest or deacon? Or can religious brothers also serve as deacons? Is the Mass legitimate? I normally don't attend this Church but would appreciate an answer. Thank you for your kind assistance, Fr. Echert.
Answer by Fr. John Echert on 10/8/2008:
Only a priest, deacon or bishop may legitimately proclaim the Gospel at Mass and preach. If the religious is a priest this is fine but if a brother (not ordained) then it is a violation of the laws governing the Sacred Liturgy.
Thanks, Marianne
Father Echert"
I attend Mass where the priest says the Mass but a religious brother reads the Gospel and gives the homily. Isn't that the exclusive duty of the priest or deacon? Or can religious brothers also serve as deacons? Is the Mass legitimate? I normally don't attend this Church but would appreciate an answer. Thank you for your kind assistance, Fr. Echert.
Answer by Fr. John Echert on 10/8/2008:
Only a priest, deacon or bishop may legitimately proclaim the Gospel at Mass and preach. If the religious is a priest this is fine but if a brother (not ordained) then it is a violation of the laws governing the Sacred Liturgy.
Thanks, Marianne
Father Echert"
EWTN.com - Old Testament
EWTN.com - Old Testament: "Old Testament
Father,
I am currious as to why the books that are considered to be or known as deuterocanical are included in our Catholic Old Testament but not included in the Jewish Holy Scriptures. I was always under the impression that our Old Testament and the Jewish Holy Scriptures were essentially the same.
Thanks
Answer by Fr. John Echert on 10/8/2008:
The fullest form of the Old Testament as approved by the Catholic Church reflects the canon (list) of the Old Testament as read and accepted by the Jews who used some writings which were not Hebrew in their language. More rigorous Jews (which does not mean correct necessary) restricted the canon to Hebrew language writings only and thereby rejected several works of the Old Testament and the whole of the New Testament, which was written in Greek.
God bless,
Father Echert"
Father,
I am currious as to why the books that are considered to be or known as deuterocanical are included in our Catholic Old Testament but not included in the Jewish Holy Scriptures. I was always under the impression that our Old Testament and the Jewish Holy Scriptures were essentially the same.
Thanks
Answer by Fr. John Echert on 10/8/2008:
The fullest form of the Old Testament as approved by the Catholic Church reflects the canon (list) of the Old Testament as read and accepted by the Jews who used some writings which were not Hebrew in their language. More rigorous Jews (which does not mean correct necessary) restricted the canon to Hebrew language writings only and thereby rejected several works of the Old Testament and the whole of the New Testament, which was written in Greek.
God bless,
Father Echert"
EWTN.com - Sad CA Catholic
EWTN.com - Sad CA Catholic: "Sad CA Catholic
Question from Anonymous on 10/10/2008:
I am a practicing catholic in CA and have been saddened to learn that practically all the other catholics I attend church with each Sunday are voting for a pro-choice candidate, voting against a ban on same sex marriage, and justifying it along the way, as are the pastors in many of the surrounding churches. I have recently become aware of the website National Catholic Reporter. Most, if not all, of these articles seem to be very liberal and against true church teachings. I've been made to feel racist, judgemental & discriminating for my conservative view. What is going on?????
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/11/2008:
Dear Anonymous
First of all, you are not wrong; what is wrong is the crisis of faith among many Catholics, not only in the pew but in the pulpit. First I recommend that you read the brilliant pastoral letter issued by Bishops Kevin Farrell and Kevin Vann (Dallas/Fort Worth) who set forth the very principles that you believe in:
http://www.fwdioc.org/img2/pServices/respect_life/joint_statement_eng.pdf
Second, perhaps you should read my book, Saving Those Damned Catholics: A Defense of Catholic Teaching which lays out the problem exactly as you describe it. As long as pulpits are silent on teaching the truth, Catholics will be afloat in a sea of moral relativism.
How to fix it? Pray for the wayward, talk to the wayward and constantly ask God for the graces to persevere. You are on the WINNING side!
Judie Brown"
Question from Anonymous on 10/10/2008:
I am a practicing catholic in CA and have been saddened to learn that practically all the other catholics I attend church with each Sunday are voting for a pro-choice candidate, voting against a ban on same sex marriage, and justifying it along the way, as are the pastors in many of the surrounding churches. I have recently become aware of the website National Catholic Reporter. Most, if not all, of these articles seem to be very liberal and against true church teachings. I've been made to feel racist, judgemental & discriminating for my conservative view. What is going on?????
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/11/2008:
Dear Anonymous
First of all, you are not wrong; what is wrong is the crisis of faith among many Catholics, not only in the pew but in the pulpit. First I recommend that you read the brilliant pastoral letter issued by Bishops Kevin Farrell and Kevin Vann (Dallas/Fort Worth) who set forth the very principles that you believe in:
http://www.fwdioc.org/img2/pServices/respect_life/joint_statement_eng.pdf
Second, perhaps you should read my book, Saving Those Damned Catholics: A Defense of Catholic Teaching which lays out the problem exactly as you describe it. As long as pulpits are silent on teaching the truth, Catholics will be afloat in a sea of moral relativism.
How to fix it? Pray for the wayward, talk to the wayward and constantly ask God for the graces to persevere. You are on the WINNING side!
Judie Brown"
Opus Dei - NEWS - Saint JosemarÃa on EWTN
Opus Dei - NEWS - Saint JosemarÃa on EWTN: "Saint JosemarÃa on EWTN
On October 30, EWTN will air a program featuring Saint JosemarÃa speaking about marriage and family life.
October 11, 2008
The program is entitled 'Meeting JosemarÃa - Brazil.' It is based on footage from Saint Josemaria's 1974 trip to Latin America. In each country he visited, he held gatherings with members of Opus Dei and friends and answered their questions about how to live out their Catholic faith in their daily lives.
The first country Saint JosemarÃa visited, Brazil, is the focus of this program. There he spoke about themes of marriage, family, holiness in the middle of the world, justice and charity, and the importance of the Catholic faith.
The half-hour long program airs Oct. 30 at 6:30 PM and 3 AM Eastern time."
On October 30, EWTN will air a program featuring Saint JosemarÃa speaking about marriage and family life.
October 11, 2008
The program is entitled 'Meeting JosemarÃa - Brazil.' It is based on footage from Saint Josemaria's 1974 trip to Latin America. In each country he visited, he held gatherings with members of Opus Dei and friends and answered their questions about how to live out their Catholic faith in their daily lives.
The first country Saint JosemarÃa visited, Brazil, is the focus of this program. There he spoke about themes of marriage, family, holiness in the middle of the world, justice and charity, and the importance of the Catholic faith.
The half-hour long program airs Oct. 30 at 6:30 PM and 3 AM Eastern time."
EWTN.com - Lay ministers who are openly campaigning for anti-life politicians
EWTN.com - Lay ministers who are openly campaigning for anti-life politicians: "Lay ministers who are openly campaigning for anti-life politicians
Will I be sued for discrmination if I write a letter to our Director of Music and Liturgy regarding his endorsement of Obama for president? I want to tell him that he has a right to vote according to his conscience but to openly endorse a candidate who espouses ideologies and theories contrary to our churches teachings is, I think, unacceptable because he is a very visible constituent of our parish. Please respond.
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/11/2008:
Dear Abby
First of all, we live in America and nobody can sue you for pointing out the truth. Fact vs. Fiction is basic information, regardless of the person or subject about which you are writing.
I might also add that those who are supporting pro-abortion candidates are in a state of grave sin, as the Bishops of Dallas and Forth Worth just made abundantly clear in their brilliant statement. You can find the statement on line: http://www.fwdioc.org/img2/pServices/respect_life/joint_statement_eng.pdf
Here is the pertinent quote:
b. If another intrinsic evil outweighs the evil of abortion. While this is sound moral reasoning, there are no “truly grave moral” or “proportionate” reasons, singularly or combined, that could outweigh the millions of innocent human lives that are directly killed by legal abortion each year.'
Judie Brown"
Will I be sued for discrmination if I write a letter to our Director of Music and Liturgy regarding his endorsement of Obama for president? I want to tell him that he has a right to vote according to his conscience but to openly endorse a candidate who espouses ideologies and theories contrary to our churches teachings is, I think, unacceptable because he is a very visible constituent of our parish. Please respond.
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/11/2008:
Dear Abby
First of all, we live in America and nobody can sue you for pointing out the truth. Fact vs. Fiction is basic information, regardless of the person or subject about which you are writing.
I might also add that those who are supporting pro-abortion candidates are in a state of grave sin, as the Bishops of Dallas and Forth Worth just made abundantly clear in their brilliant statement. You can find the statement on line: http://www.fwdioc.org/img2/pServices/respect_life/joint_statement_eng.pdf
Here is the pertinent quote:
b. If another intrinsic evil outweighs the evil of abortion. While this is sound moral reasoning, there are no “truly grave moral” or “proportionate” reasons, singularly or combined, that could outweigh the millions of innocent human lives that are directly killed by legal abortion each year.'
Judie Brown"
Catholic Culture : Commentary: Blog
Catholic Culture : Commentary: Blog: "Does heaven hear the music of sinners? Posted Oct. 11, 2008 9:35 AM || by Phil Lawler || category Commentary
Jeff's Commentary article on whether Shakespeare was a Catholic put me in a speculative frame of mind. We don't know for sure whether Shakespeare was Catholic-- although it's an interesting debate. But we do know that he wasn't a martyr.
We do know with certainty, as a matter of faith, that Sts. Thomas More and John Fisher are in heaven. We don't know with any certainty where William Shakespeare is spending his eternity. What would it profit a man, if he became the greatest literary figure in history, but lost his immortal soul?
Shakespeare was undoubtedly a genius: an author who was inspired, in the conventional sense of that word (that is, not divinely inspired, like the Gospel writers). Mozart was inspired, too; some have even gone so far as to suggest that angels whispered the tunes in Mozart's ears.
But were Shakespeare and Mozart saints? We know very little about Shakespeare's private life; the available details in Mozart's case are not encouraging. Of course we don't know the answer. We do know that's the big question.
It is, I think, fair to assume that heaven is densely populated with souls who, during their earthly life, knew and loved the works of Shakespeare and Mozart and other great creative artists. Let's hope and pray that we join them. It's sobering to consider that the authors may not be in heaven to accept our congratulations and thanks."
Jeff's Commentary article on whether Shakespeare was a Catholic put me in a speculative frame of mind. We don't know for sure whether Shakespeare was Catholic-- although it's an interesting debate. But we do know that he wasn't a martyr.
We do know with certainty, as a matter of faith, that Sts. Thomas More and John Fisher are in heaven. We don't know with any certainty where William Shakespeare is spending his eternity. What would it profit a man, if he became the greatest literary figure in history, but lost his immortal soul?
Shakespeare was undoubtedly a genius: an author who was inspired, in the conventional sense of that word (that is, not divinely inspired, like the Gospel writers). Mozart was inspired, too; some have even gone so far as to suggest that angels whispered the tunes in Mozart's ears.
But were Shakespeare and Mozart saints? We know very little about Shakespeare's private life; the available details in Mozart's case are not encouraging. Of course we don't know the answer. We do know that's the big question.
It is, I think, fair to assume that heaven is densely populated with souls who, during their earthly life, knew and loved the works of Shakespeare and Mozart and other great creative artists. Let's hope and pray that we join them. It's sobering to consider that the authors may not be in heaven to accept our congratulations and thanks."
EWTN.com - Death of Spouse
EWTN.com - Death of Spouse: "Death of Spouse
Question from Joseph A. Apicella on 10/10/2008:
The newspapers have carried the story of a missing person whose remains have just been discovered. He was declared dead by a civil court a few months earlier. I was wondering if Canon law follows civil law and would permit a Catholic to remarry after a civil court declared the spouse dead ? I was told that after the sinking of the Titanic most of those missing were declared dead and there families were permitted to administer their estates in a rather short time. Would the same civil ruling aply to the spouse in order for her to remarry?
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/10/2008:
Canon law has a specific procedure for situations of a presumed death of a spouse in situations where the death is somewhat ambiguous. I would think that, in such a process, the findings of a civil court might be strong evidence and perhaps fully probative for the canonical process."
Question from Joseph A. Apicella on 10/10/2008:
The newspapers have carried the story of a missing person whose remains have just been discovered. He was declared dead by a civil court a few months earlier. I was wondering if Canon law follows civil law and would permit a Catholic to remarry after a civil court declared the spouse dead ? I was told that after the sinking of the Titanic most of those missing were declared dead and there families were permitted to administer their estates in a rather short time. Would the same civil ruling aply to the spouse in order for her to remarry?
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/10/2008:
Canon law has a specific procedure for situations of a presumed death of a spouse in situations where the death is somewhat ambiguous. I would think that, in such a process, the findings of a civil court might be strong evidence and perhaps fully probative for the canonical process."
EWTN.com - Children's Liturgy
EWTN.com - Children's Liturgy: "Children's Liturgy
Question from Anon on 10/3/2008:
Dear Father,
We have a children's liturgy of the Word in our parish. We have a rota of people to lead it. There is a variance of opinion amongst the leaders about the required elements of the liturgy for children. Some include a simplified penitential rite, a Gloria, an Alleluia and the Gospel. Others dispense with all these elements and lead an activity on the theme of the day (eg on Rosary Sunday they may simply focus on the Rosary).
We are in the UK and we have no official children's lectionary as far as I am aware.
My question is: Which (if any) elements are necessary in the children's liturgy of the Word? Does the exclusion of any of them impact on the fulfilling of the Sunday obligation - either for the children or for the adults who assist?
Many thanks for your help.
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/10/2008:
The Directory for Masses with Children Pueros Baptizatos gives the directives for how children's liturgy of the words are to be celebrated.
Those elements that a part of the Introductory Rites are not to be included in the children's Liturgy of the Word. So excluded are the penitential rite and Gloria.
The children's Liturgy of the Word should include ordinarily at least one reading before the gospel, the singing of a psalm, alleluia, the gospel, a homily-like talk, the creed (including the possibility of the Apostles' Creed), and general intercessions. There are published approved children's lectionaries that have simplied versions of the readings that are easier to understand. If this is not the case in the UK, then the regular lectionary must be used. Obviously the talk and the general intercessions should be prepared according to the mentality of children.
I would emphasize that a children's Liturgy of the Word should still be a liturgy, like what is going on during the Mass for the rest of the assembly. It should not be a time for art and crafts and it is not a catechism class. It should give the children a Liturgy of the Word that they understand and help them understand more fully what is happening in a usual Liturgy of the Word.
Those who participate in a children's Liturgy of the Word, both adults and children, fulfill their Sunday obligation.
However, in my experience, many adults who lead children's liturgies of the word decide on their own to attend another Mass so that they can also benefit from the homily. However, this would not be strictly required."
Question from Anon on 10/3/2008:
Dear Father,
We have a children's liturgy of the Word in our parish. We have a rota of people to lead it. There is a variance of opinion amongst the leaders about the required elements of the liturgy for children. Some include a simplified penitential rite, a Gloria, an Alleluia and the Gospel. Others dispense with all these elements and lead an activity on the theme of the day (eg on Rosary Sunday they may simply focus on the Rosary).
We are in the UK and we have no official children's lectionary as far as I am aware.
My question is: Which (if any) elements are necessary in the children's liturgy of the Word? Does the exclusion of any of them impact on the fulfilling of the Sunday obligation - either for the children or for the adults who assist?
Many thanks for your help.
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/10/2008:
The Directory for Masses with Children Pueros Baptizatos gives the directives for how children's liturgy of the words are to be celebrated.
Those elements that a part of the Introductory Rites are not to be included in the children's Liturgy of the Word. So excluded are the penitential rite and Gloria.
The children's Liturgy of the Word should include ordinarily at least one reading before the gospel, the singing of a psalm, alleluia, the gospel, a homily-like talk, the creed (including the possibility of the Apostles' Creed), and general intercessions. There are published approved children's lectionaries that have simplied versions of the readings that are easier to understand. If this is not the case in the UK, then the regular lectionary must be used. Obviously the talk and the general intercessions should be prepared according to the mentality of children.
I would emphasize that a children's Liturgy of the Word should still be a liturgy, like what is going on during the Mass for the rest of the assembly. It should not be a time for art and crafts and it is not a catechism class. It should give the children a Liturgy of the Word that they understand and help them understand more fully what is happening in a usual Liturgy of the Word.
Those who participate in a children's Liturgy of the Word, both adults and children, fulfill their Sunday obligation.
However, in my experience, many adults who lead children's liturgies of the word decide on their own to attend another Mass so that they can also benefit from the homily. However, this would not be strictly required."
EWTN.com - Nullity of Marriage
EWTN.com - Nullity of Marriage: "Nullity of Marriage
Question from Judy on 10/3/2008:
My husband and I were married legally outside the Church and then had our marriage blessed inside the Church. We have been married for six years.
My husband has been through a rough upbringing. Mother committed suicide when he was 7 y.o., and father is an alcoholic. His 4 brothers all have mental illness, Bipolar Manic, Schizophrenia, Depression. I believe my husband suffers from at least depression. He has seen a psychiatrist in the past, but refuses to continue to see him and will not take any medications for depression. My husband after much prompting from me is finally seaking spiritual direction, praise God. However, am I a doubting Thomas for having hope in this marriage? In other words, my husband doesn't love his neighbor. He says he loves God, but how can he love God if he doesn't love his neighbor. The doubt comes in and I think, if he doesn't therefore love God, how can he truly love me? I have a lot of health issues with autoimmune disease and the stress of this relationship in the past has not been good for my physical and emotional health. Please advise and God Bless.
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/10/2008:
Especially considering the psychological factors involved, I would be cautious of judging your husband's ability or intention to love. Jesus teaches that we need to love both God and neighbor, but just the fact that he stresses that they need to go together implicitly acknowledges the fact that, for some people, they do not.
After all, we might be called to love everyone. But in reality, we do not. We might love some people and not others. Your husband very well might love you but not certain others. He also might have feelings and intentions of love but have difficulties expressing this. I really don't know, but I'd encourage you not to assume the worse."
Question from Judy on 10/3/2008:
My husband and I were married legally outside the Church and then had our marriage blessed inside the Church. We have been married for six years.
My husband has been through a rough upbringing. Mother committed suicide when he was 7 y.o., and father is an alcoholic. His 4 brothers all have mental illness, Bipolar Manic, Schizophrenia, Depression. I believe my husband suffers from at least depression. He has seen a psychiatrist in the past, but refuses to continue to see him and will not take any medications for depression. My husband after much prompting from me is finally seaking spiritual direction, praise God. However, am I a doubting Thomas for having hope in this marriage? In other words, my husband doesn't love his neighbor. He says he loves God, but how can he love God if he doesn't love his neighbor. The doubt comes in and I think, if he doesn't therefore love God, how can he truly love me? I have a lot of health issues with autoimmune disease and the stress of this relationship in the past has not been good for my physical and emotional health. Please advise and God Bless.
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/10/2008:
Especially considering the psychological factors involved, I would be cautious of judging your husband's ability or intention to love. Jesus teaches that we need to love both God and neighbor, but just the fact that he stresses that they need to go together implicitly acknowledges the fact that, for some people, they do not.
After all, we might be called to love everyone. But in reality, we do not. We might love some people and not others. Your husband very well might love you but not certain others. He also might have feelings and intentions of love but have difficulties expressing this. I really don't know, but I'd encourage you not to assume the worse."
EWTN.com - bells during mass
EWTN.com - bells during mass: "bells during mass
Question from Linda on 10/4/2008:
We are lucky enough to have still have the bells rung during the epiclesis and the elevation of the host. The servers use a small, high pitched metal bell that must be shaken to ring. My question is, what is the proper way to ring the bell? Some servers ring the bell for 5 seconds or so, others give it a quick ring, with the clapper producing one or two 'dings'. Is there a preferred way?
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/10/2008:
There are no specific directives on how to ring the bells. I tend to prefer the ring to not be too brief."
Question from Linda on 10/4/2008:
We are lucky enough to have still have the bells rung during the epiclesis and the elevation of the host. The servers use a small, high pitched metal bell that must be shaken to ring. My question is, what is the proper way to ring the bell? Some servers ring the bell for 5 seconds or so, others give it a quick ring, with the clapper producing one or two 'dings'. Is there a preferred way?
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/10/2008:
There are no specific directives on how to ring the bells. I tend to prefer the ring to not be too brief."
EWTN.com - Late to Mass
EWTN.com - Late to Mass: "Late to Mass
Question from alex on 10/4/2008:
Is it possible to be too late to Mass in order to receive communion?
So many people seem to have no idea about this. I heard from an old holy priest that it used to be commonly observed and taught that if one comes so late so as to miss the Gospel reading, he cannot go to Communion - and he added that this had long been a custom, and that even in many popular Churches of old where all the altars were being used at once and Masses were said one right after the other on each one, that in these cases, one could receive whenever he might walk in on a mass, but he had to stay for the next Mass until he had heard all he had missed.
I have always followed this teaching, myself, with never any problem or scruple - God has seemed to always provide a way for me to receive daily Communion in accord with this rule. Not that sacrifices never had to be made in order to recieve, but they all seem slight to me now and I have no regrets about them.
But my question is, does the Church still teach this? I have read as many liturgical documents of late as I could, but have not seen anything explicit. But there is one that does declare:
One should not approach the Table of the Bread, unless he has been at the Table of the Word.
This was several years ago, it was published during the papacy of JPII; and I don't quite remember the name of it - Dominus something or other.
Do you have an explicit answer on this?
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/10/2008:
There is nothing in the current law of the Church that permits a person to arrive once Mass has started and still receive Holy Communion. There is also nothing that says that a person cannot receive Holy Communion if one has arrived late.
I think that the circumstances need to be examined. If a person is habitually late and is at fault for not planning enough time to arrive before Mass begins, then perhaps that person should not receive Holy Communion. On the other hand, if a person was at home caring for a sick child and couldn't leave in time, or if the person unexpectedly gets caught in a traffic jam that was due to a traffic accident, then I don't see a problem with receiving Holy Communion.
So basically, the law does not provide an answer. But an examination of the person's intentions and the circumstances need to be considered."
Question from alex on 10/4/2008:
Is it possible to be too late to Mass in order to receive communion?
So many people seem to have no idea about this. I heard from an old holy priest that it used to be commonly observed and taught that if one comes so late so as to miss the Gospel reading, he cannot go to Communion - and he added that this had long been a custom, and that even in many popular Churches of old where all the altars were being used at once and Masses were said one right after the other on each one, that in these cases, one could receive whenever he might walk in on a mass, but he had to stay for the next Mass until he had heard all he had missed.
I have always followed this teaching, myself, with never any problem or scruple - God has seemed to always provide a way for me to receive daily Communion in accord with this rule. Not that sacrifices never had to be made in order to recieve, but they all seem slight to me now and I have no regrets about them.
But my question is, does the Church still teach this? I have read as many liturgical documents of late as I could, but have not seen anything explicit. But there is one that does declare:
One should not approach the Table of the Bread, unless he has been at the Table of the Word.
This was several years ago, it was published during the papacy of JPII; and I don't quite remember the name of it - Dominus something or other.
Do you have an explicit answer on this?
Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 10/10/2008:
There is nothing in the current law of the Church that permits a person to arrive once Mass has started and still receive Holy Communion. There is also nothing that says that a person cannot receive Holy Communion if one has arrived late.
I think that the circumstances need to be examined. If a person is habitually late and is at fault for not planning enough time to arrive before Mass begins, then perhaps that person should not receive Holy Communion. On the other hand, if a person was at home caring for a sick child and couldn't leave in time, or if the person unexpectedly gets caught in a traffic jam that was due to a traffic accident, then I don't see a problem with receiving Holy Communion.
So basically, the law does not provide an answer. But an examination of the person's intentions and the circumstances need to be considered."
EWTN.com - brain death
EWTN.com - brain death: "brain death
Question from wondering on 10/10/2008:
Since brain death has come into question when retrieving vital organs for transplant, can a Catholic in good conscience go through the process and recieve one?
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/10/2008:
Dear Wondering
My humble opinion as a non theologian is that it is not moral to receive a VITAL organ, but it certainly is moral to receive transplants that do not require the possible taking of another's life.
Judie Brown"
Question from wondering on 10/10/2008:
Since brain death has come into question when retrieving vital organs for transplant, can a Catholic in good conscience go through the process and recieve one?
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/10/2008:
Dear Wondering
My humble opinion as a non theologian is that it is not moral to receive a VITAL organ, but it certainly is moral to receive transplants that do not require the possible taking of another's life.
Judie Brown"
EWTN.com - Embryonic Stem Cell Research
EWTN.com - Embryonic Stem Cell Research: "Embryonic Stem Cell Research
Question from Anonymous on 10/9/2008:
I understand the Church's stance on embryonic stem cell research. I can't understand the opposition if unwanted embryos that are routinely discarded by fertility clinics are used for this much-needed research.
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/10/2008:
Dear Anonymous
In order to understand Catholic teaching you have to first know that the Church is totally opposed to in vitro fertilization, which is considered an unethical practice. Therefore, the difficulty you mention with 'unwanted embryos' simply affirms the Church's wisdom in teaching that IVF should not be done in the first place.
Judie Brown"
Question from Anonymous on 10/9/2008:
I understand the Church's stance on embryonic stem cell research. I can't understand the opposition if unwanted embryos that are routinely discarded by fertility clinics are used for this much-needed research.
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/10/2008:
Dear Anonymous
In order to understand Catholic teaching you have to first know that the Church is totally opposed to in vitro fertilization, which is considered an unethical practice. Therefore, the difficulty you mention with 'unwanted embryos' simply affirms the Church's wisdom in teaching that IVF should not be done in the first place.
Judie Brown"
EWTN.com - Catholics for a free choice
EWTN.com - Catholics for a free choice: "Catholics for a free choice
Question from Sharon on 10/9/2008:
Is there any recourse available to the Catholic Church for 'Catholics for a Free Choice' using the word Catholics when the group is not sanctioned by the Catholic Church? It seems, if a company were to use a registered trademark without permission, there could be a law suit. Can the Catholic Church stand up against this misuse?
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/10/2008:
Dear Sharon
The only way that something substantive could be done about Catholics for a Free Choice and their use of the word 'Catholic' would be for the Bishops of the United States to make a concerted effort to destroy the credibility of the group and repeatedly focus on the fact that they are not Catholic."
Question from Sharon on 10/9/2008:
Is there any recourse available to the Catholic Church for 'Catholics for a Free Choice' using the word Catholics when the group is not sanctioned by the Catholic Church? It seems, if a company were to use a registered trademark without permission, there could be a law suit. Can the Catholic Church stand up against this misuse?
Answer by Judie Brown on 10/10/2008:
Dear Sharon
The only way that something substantive could be done about Catholics for a Free Choice and their use of the word 'Catholic' would be for the Bishops of the United States to make a concerted effort to destroy the credibility of the group and repeatedly focus on the fact that they are not Catholic."
California restores ‘bride’ and ‘groom’ to marriage licenses
California restores ‘bride’ and ‘groom’ to marriage licenses: "California restores ‘bride’ and ‘groom’ to marriage licenses
Sacramento, Oct 9, 2008 / 04:16 am (CNA).- The California Department of Public Health, which provides marriage-license forms to counties across the state, will again allow couples who contract a marriage to again identify themselves as “bride” and “groom” on their marriage licenses starting in November.
According to the California Catholic Daily, following the California Supreme Court decision imposing same-sex marriages in the state, the vital statistics section of the state health department created new marriage license forms allowing couples only to identify themselves as “Party A” and “Party B.”
The change was strongly protested. Rachel Bird and Gideon Codding of Roseville, California last week sued the state over the elimination of the traditional description.
However, a spokeswoman for the Department of Public Health told the Sacramento Bee the new forms were not a response to the lawsuit
“Many Californians have asked to have the option to identify as ‘bride’ and ‘groom’ on their marriage license form,” says an announcement on the Public Health Department’s web site. “The California Department of Public Health has been reviewing how we can provide those options in a way that is consistent with court rulings on marriage. The state will begin using new forms effective November 17th that will include boxes for ‘bride’ or ‘groom.’ Identifying as a ‘bride’ or a ‘groom’ is optional, not mandatory.”
Under the new marriage-license rules, couples may choose “bride” and “groom,” “bride” and “bride,” “groom” and “groom” or leave the section blank, the California Catholic Daily reports."
Sacramento, Oct 9, 2008 / 04:16 am (CNA).- The California Department of Public Health, which provides marriage-license forms to counties across the state, will again allow couples who contract a marriage to again identify themselves as “bride” and “groom” on their marriage licenses starting in November.
According to the California Catholic Daily, following the California Supreme Court decision imposing same-sex marriages in the state, the vital statistics section of the state health department created new marriage license forms allowing couples only to identify themselves as “Party A” and “Party B.”
The change was strongly protested. Rachel Bird and Gideon Codding of Roseville, California last week sued the state over the elimination of the traditional description.
However, a spokeswoman for the Department of Public Health told the Sacramento Bee the new forms were not a response to the lawsuit
“Many Californians have asked to have the option to identify as ‘bride’ and ‘groom’ on their marriage license form,” says an announcement on the Public Health Department’s web site. “The California Department of Public Health has been reviewing how we can provide those options in a way that is consistent with court rulings on marriage. The state will begin using new forms effective November 17th that will include boxes for ‘bride’ or ‘groom.’ Identifying as a ‘bride’ or a ‘groom’ is optional, not mandatory.”
Under the new marriage-license rules, couples may choose “bride” and “groom,” “bride” and “bride,” “groom” and “groom” or leave the section blank, the California Catholic Daily reports."
Australian doctors oppose anti-conscience abortion bill
Australian doctors oppose anti-conscience abortion bill: "Australian doctors oppose anti-conscience abortion bill
Archbishop Hart opens crisis pregnancy center
Archbishop Denis Hart
Melbourne, Oct 9, 2008 / 02:33 am (CNA).- The Archbishop of Melbourne opened a crisis pregnancy center on Wednesday, saying the womb had become an endangered area. His action came as a group defending the conscience rights of doctors criticized an Abortion Law Reform Bill pending in the parliament of the Australian state of Victoria which could force medical professionals to take part in abortions.
The group Doctors in Conscience against Abortion Bill recently formed to advocate for the rejection of the bill. Its membership includes almost 200 doctors as well as nurses, psychologists, and pharmacists.
The group represents people of various faiths and people professing no faith.
Some of its members spoke at a conference in Queens Hall at Parliament House in Melbourne on Monday.
Joanne Grainger, who is a lecturer in nursing and a bioethicist, said that if the bill is enacted nurses will be forced to be accomplices in abortion against their reasoned conscience.
'This is completely in opposition to current practice in Victoria and limits nurses’ freedom of thought, conscience and religion,' she argued.
Jacinta Le Page, a fifth-year medical student, noted that she was being trained to make life and death decisions while caring for people. Such decisions, she stated, require the integrity and conscience the proposed bill would have her disregard.
She appealed to members of parliament, urging: “Do not strip us of our freedom to exercise our deepest commitment to practicing medicine – saving and improving quality of life.”
As debate on the proposal began in Victoria’s Upper House, Archbishop of Melbourne Denis J. Hart opened a pregnancy assistance center in Frankston, a town south of Melbourne.
The center is a not-for-profit incorporated charity and the initiative of parishioners drawn from a number of parishes in the Mornington Peninsula Deanery, CathNews reports.
The storefront center was crowded by supporters and dozens of spectators lined the pavement outside to welcome the archbishop.
Archbishop Hart said he was “particularly delighted” to be asked to open the center, which he credited to the “persistent efforts” of some “determined local mothers.”
“It will fill a critical gap on the Mornington Peninsula and beyond, especially for young and needy people who've been seeking information and resources about the various challenges of pregnancy.”
The archbishop said that free pregnancy tests will be offered at the center along with services for financial, family, and relationship support.
The volunteer-staffed center consists of mothers, aunts, and grandmothers who have all “volunteered to pool and share their own wealth of experience that have helped them survive personal difficulty, or trying circumstances,” Archbishop Hart said.
The Australian prelate also used the occasion to warned of the consequences of passing the proposed Abortion Bill. 'At a time when our state parliamentarians are debating changes to our abortion laws, communities will welcome the establishment of centers such as these which very much identify with the anxiety of single mothers, mums with several young children and those who've also been abandoned by partners or families. One may be forgiven for suggesting that to live in the womb or old age should be considered endangered areas.”
'Unplanned pregnancies don't have to be regarded as crises to trigger alarm or despair. Environments like this will provide emotional support, assistance and advice without pressure. Women and girls in such distress, and their partners, will be particularly welcomed here,' he concluded."
Archbishop Hart opens crisis pregnancy center
Archbishop Denis Hart
Melbourne, Oct 9, 2008 / 02:33 am (CNA).- The Archbishop of Melbourne opened a crisis pregnancy center on Wednesday, saying the womb had become an endangered area. His action came as a group defending the conscience rights of doctors criticized an Abortion Law Reform Bill pending in the parliament of the Australian state of Victoria which could force medical professionals to take part in abortions.
The group Doctors in Conscience against Abortion Bill recently formed to advocate for the rejection of the bill. Its membership includes almost 200 doctors as well as nurses, psychologists, and pharmacists.
The group represents people of various faiths and people professing no faith.
Some of its members spoke at a conference in Queens Hall at Parliament House in Melbourne on Monday.
Joanne Grainger, who is a lecturer in nursing and a bioethicist, said that if the bill is enacted nurses will be forced to be accomplices in abortion against their reasoned conscience.
'This is completely in opposition to current practice in Victoria and limits nurses’ freedom of thought, conscience and religion,' she argued.
Jacinta Le Page, a fifth-year medical student, noted that she was being trained to make life and death decisions while caring for people. Such decisions, she stated, require the integrity and conscience the proposed bill would have her disregard.
She appealed to members of parliament, urging: “Do not strip us of our freedom to exercise our deepest commitment to practicing medicine – saving and improving quality of life.”
As debate on the proposal began in Victoria’s Upper House, Archbishop of Melbourne Denis J. Hart opened a pregnancy assistance center in Frankston, a town south of Melbourne.
The center is a not-for-profit incorporated charity and the initiative of parishioners drawn from a number of parishes in the Mornington Peninsula Deanery, CathNews reports.
The storefront center was crowded by supporters and dozens of spectators lined the pavement outside to welcome the archbishop.
Archbishop Hart said he was “particularly delighted” to be asked to open the center, which he credited to the “persistent efforts” of some “determined local mothers.”
“It will fill a critical gap on the Mornington Peninsula and beyond, especially for young and needy people who've been seeking information and resources about the various challenges of pregnancy.”
The archbishop said that free pregnancy tests will be offered at the center along with services for financial, family, and relationship support.
The volunteer-staffed center consists of mothers, aunts, and grandmothers who have all “volunteered to pool and share their own wealth of experience that have helped them survive personal difficulty, or trying circumstances,” Archbishop Hart said.
The Australian prelate also used the occasion to warned of the consequences of passing the proposed Abortion Bill. 'At a time when our state parliamentarians are debating changes to our abortion laws, communities will welcome the establishment of centers such as these which very much identify with the anxiety of single mothers, mums with several young children and those who've also been abandoned by partners or families. One may be forgiven for suggesting that to live in the womb or old age should be considered endangered areas.”
'Unplanned pregnancies don't have to be regarded as crises to trigger alarm or despair. Environments like this will provide emotional support, assistance and advice without pressure. Women and girls in such distress, and their partners, will be particularly welcomed here,' he concluded."
Thousands of inquirers visit vocations advice web site
Thousands of inquirers visit vocations advice web site: "Thousands of inquirers visit vocations advice web site
Chicago, Oct 9, 2008 / 01:07 am (CNA).- Vision Vocation Guide and the VocationMatch.com web site have reported that over the past year more than 6,900 people interested in Catholic religious vocations completed online profiles and requested information from religious communities through the web site.
The web site gathers information from inquirers and matches their profiles against the profiles of religious communities to produce recommendations, similar to the way matches are made at dating sites.
Vision Vocation Guide says in a press release that VocationMatch.com users become “more qualified discerners” who have considered practical questions about a religious vocation, such as whether he or she wants to live in a monastery or a house, live in a large community or a small one, minister locally or overseas, wear a habit or religious symbol, and pray with others once a day or several times a day.
The site reports that the number of reader profiles has jumped from 1,503 to 5,591 in the past year.
'Vision Vocation Match has become an indispensable tool for Catholic religious vocation discernment,' said Patrice Tuohy, executive editor of VISION Vocation Guide, which produces the site.
“With fewer Catholics being taught by religious sisters, brothers, and priests, exposure to those living in religious communities has declined but interest in religious life has actually increased in recent years,' remarked Tuohy. 'The internet has played a significant role in getting the word out about religious life. Now Vocation Match has taken things one step further by assisting discerners in sorting through large amounts of information in a more efficient and accessible way.”
VocationMatch.com has been mentioned in Time magazine and on the CBS Evening News.
Vision Vocation Guide also hosts a Spanish-language version of the site at EncuentroVocacional.com. The company also produces DigitalVocationGuide.org and VocationGuide.org, providing vocation opportunity postings, searchable community listings, lively blogs, quizzes, and statistics on trends, and a new question-and-answer column by author Alice Camille."
Chicago, Oct 9, 2008 / 01:07 am (CNA).- Vision Vocation Guide and the VocationMatch.com web site have reported that over the past year more than 6,900 people interested in Catholic religious vocations completed online profiles and requested information from religious communities through the web site.
The web site gathers information from inquirers and matches their profiles against the profiles of religious communities to produce recommendations, similar to the way matches are made at dating sites.
Vision Vocation Guide says in a press release that VocationMatch.com users become “more qualified discerners” who have considered practical questions about a religious vocation, such as whether he or she wants to live in a monastery or a house, live in a large community or a small one, minister locally or overseas, wear a habit or religious symbol, and pray with others once a day or several times a day.
The site reports that the number of reader profiles has jumped from 1,503 to 5,591 in the past year.
'Vision Vocation Match has become an indispensable tool for Catholic religious vocation discernment,' said Patrice Tuohy, executive editor of VISION Vocation Guide, which produces the site.
“With fewer Catholics being taught by religious sisters, brothers, and priests, exposure to those living in religious communities has declined but interest in religious life has actually increased in recent years,' remarked Tuohy. 'The internet has played a significant role in getting the word out about religious life. Now Vocation Match has taken things one step further by assisting discerners in sorting through large amounts of information in a more efficient and accessible way.”
VocationMatch.com has been mentioned in Time magazine and on the CBS Evening News.
Vision Vocation Guide also hosts a Spanish-language version of the site at EncuentroVocacional.com. The company also produces DigitalVocationGuide.org and VocationGuide.org, providing vocation opportunity postings, searchable community listings, lively blogs, quizzes, and statistics on trends, and a new question-and-answer column by author Alice Camille."
Closing boarders will not solve immigrant woes, say Vatican officials
Closing boarders will not solve immigrant woes, say Vatican officials: "Closing boarders will not solve immigrant woes, say Vatican officials
Vatican City, Oct 8, 2008 / 07:07 pm (CNA).- Presenting the Holy Father's message for the 94th World Day of Migrants and Refugees, Renato Raffaele Martino and Archbishop Agostino Marchetto, respectively president and secretary of the Pontifical Council for the Pastoral Care of Migrants and Itinerant People announced this morning that countries must welcome migrants with hospitality into their borders.
The message, on the theme, 'St. Paul Migrant, Apostle of the Peoples,' was written for the World Day of Migrants and Refugees, to be celebrated on January 18, 2009.
Presenting the message this morning, Cardinal Martino affirmed that 'the phenomenon of migration in a globalized world is becoming effectively unstoppable. The problem will not be solved by closing frontiers, but by States welcoming - with just, well-balanced regulation - the migratory flows.'
Archbishop Marchetto added that hospitality is necessary for the pastoral care for refugees, asylum-seekers and displaced persons. 'Hospitality ensures that we welcome others as persons - and in some cases also as brothers or sisters in the faith - and that we do not consider them as a cases, numbers, or mere components of the workforce.'
The prelate also noted that for years, refugees have been treated “with no consideration for the reasons that forced them to flee. This has also been translated into attempts to prevent their entry into States and into the adoption of measures aimed at making such entry more difficult' such as 'the obligation to possess entrance visas, and the publication of lists of so-called 'safe countries'.'
'May the dedication with which St. Paul the migrant carried out his mission, inspire the Church and society to find united responses to the challenges present in modern society, so as to promote peaceful coexistence among different ethnic groups, cultures and religions,” Archbishop Marchetto prayed."
Vatican City, Oct 8, 2008 / 07:07 pm (CNA).- Presenting the Holy Father's message for the 94th World Day of Migrants and Refugees, Renato Raffaele Martino and Archbishop Agostino Marchetto, respectively president and secretary of the Pontifical Council for the Pastoral Care of Migrants and Itinerant People announced this morning that countries must welcome migrants with hospitality into their borders.
The message, on the theme, 'St. Paul Migrant, Apostle of the Peoples,' was written for the World Day of Migrants and Refugees, to be celebrated on January 18, 2009.
Presenting the message this morning, Cardinal Martino affirmed that 'the phenomenon of migration in a globalized world is becoming effectively unstoppable. The problem will not be solved by closing frontiers, but by States welcoming - with just, well-balanced regulation - the migratory flows.'
Archbishop Marchetto added that hospitality is necessary for the pastoral care for refugees, asylum-seekers and displaced persons. 'Hospitality ensures that we welcome others as persons - and in some cases also as brothers or sisters in the faith - and that we do not consider them as a cases, numbers, or mere components of the workforce.'
The prelate also noted that for years, refugees have been treated “with no consideration for the reasons that forced them to flee. This has also been translated into attempts to prevent their entry into States and into the adoption of measures aimed at making such entry more difficult' such as 'the obligation to possess entrance visas, and the publication of lists of so-called 'safe countries'.'
'May the dedication with which St. Paul the migrant carried out his mission, inspire the Church and society to find united responses to the challenges present in modern society, so as to promote peaceful coexistence among different ethnic groups, cultures and religions,” Archbishop Marchetto prayed."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)